dissapointing.

Rating: 3/10 (28 September 2003)

bill murray is by far one of the best comic actors of his generation. His work in Rushmore warranted an academy award, and the fact that he was not recognized only reveals the poor taste of the academy. in lost in translation, bill murray shines. his every movement and gesture communicates more than most of his contemporaries could in an entire scene. however, he is the only reason that this movie has any entertainment value. coppola doesn't seem to know what she wants to say about tokyo, love, or alienation. a few of her shots are absolutely beautiful, such as the view of tokyo from the hotel window, but many others are unnecessarily slow and seemingly thoughtful- but absent of any real purpose. The finished result is sloppy. Boom mikes are visible. Murray does something that would be morally objectionable by his characters standards, yet is not phased- and the act is never mentioned again throughout the movie. Had Bill Murray not been in this film, it would be a flop. And as it is, he is the only reason worth watching. Save your money until this is released on video.