One award I think Lost should be nominated for

Rating: Null/10 (1 March 2004)

Who knew getting rich was that easy? 27 days to shoot a low budget film that is nominated for best picture of the year, alongside a TRUE movie masterpiece that took 7 years and millions of dollars to make...I have to ask, where do I sign up to film the next "Romanic-Comedy"?
I actually stayed up to insure that this catastrophe did NOT take home the Movie of the Year oscar. Im so glad that the people that voted at the oscars had more sense than those who called Lost in Translation movie of the year, or even those poor mis-guided souls that said it was the "best movie ever". Don't you think you're going alittle overboard there. I'd sooner nominate Groundhogs Day or Caddyshack over this disaster, atleast both of those films had some hint of "Comedy" in them. As far as romance, well...I did shed tears (tears of joy when it was over).
Now don't get me wrong, I love Bill Murray, but I'm sorry, even if he was the best actor in the world he still couldn't save this train wreck.
You'd be surprised how many poor, unsuspecting souls have not had the chance to see this movie. I've told all my friends, rent it, watch it, and tell me if I'm insane. No plot, slooooooooow story in general only to find out that nothing really happened. Wait, something did happen, Ms. Coppola took a 1 page story and turned it into an hour and a half of your life down the tube.
In my own opinion, if there was an R.I.P. awards show, that's one I'd vote Lost in Translation picture of the century for.