The best thing I can say about it is that it wasn't more than 90 minutes long

Rating: 1/10 (28 May 2004)

I thought this film would be a lot better than it was and would not recommend it to anyone. According to the DVD box cover it got over 80 four star reviews. On the back Roger Ebert gave it a thumbs up and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone said it was "flat out hilarious!"
Unfortunately nothing could be further from the truth. I found it for the most part dull and tedious and not the least bit funny. I can't figure out what all the fuss was about.
It starts off slow and never picks up. The acting is OK but nothing to write home about.
This is one of the few films I've seen that I wish I hadn't wasted my money on.