Not for the Common Man (Post-Commentary)

Rating: Null/10 (9 March 2004)

If you are one of the many who liked this movie, you are probably speaking like this: "Ah, bask in the Sociological commentary and allusion. The imagery and heartfelt warmth is overpowering.."
If you are one of the many who did not like this movie, you are probably sounding like this: "What kind of boring drivel have I just wasted my time on? Three funny spots from Bill, that's it. I can't believe everyone is going so crazy over this.."
Why do I pose both? Because I can see both sides. The 'intellectual' found much depth and alliteration present. The 'commoner' found a drab, lifeless attempt at comedy (Murray's Memorable Moments aside).
Joe or Jane Worker will probably not reach past what is presented on the screen and draw in meaning in between the frames. Why should they? Since when is entertainment laborious?
Unless the viewer is one who frequents Art Galleries and is adept at 'reaching for meaning', they will NOT like his movie. If you like your plot drawn out for you over time and the characters shown for what they are, steer clear.
Many people will find this movie boring (as they might any art show). Many have also found it 'deep' and 'meaningful'. This movie is ONLY for the latter, those who wish to stare and think (and possibly not really be entertained) and NOT the common man.