Die Hard 4 : Blast of Action, Reasonable plot But No Great Ending! Silly!

Rating: 5/10 (23 February 2009)

Die Hard 4.0 or Live Free or Die Hard (I think many one should called it Die Hard 4 rather than the 20 Century Fox name, may be their executives think the movie should have the great name but people still call it Die Hard 4) is the new sequel since Die Hard with a Vengeance which was ended very silly in 1995.
After I watched this movie, I think this sequel was not really "Die Hard" way, even many one liked it but not me. I was OK with the first 90 minutes of the movie but after that, it made me disappointed with it. Die Hard 4 had a very good plot for using the computer hacking subject in this sequel and they showed how the villain could get over the computer system in the U.S.A.
Despite the very good plot and extreme action, I didn't like the way of Thomas Gabriel in this movie. Gabriel is really the one of my heinous villain in many movies I watched. His devilish thrilled every one to see how he is end but it was very silly for his death. I didn't know who made the direction for Thomas Gabriel's death in the movie. That's not Die Hard. If you had seen "Firewall" starred by Harrison Ford or "The Marine" starred by John Cena, WWE Superstars. Die Hard 4 is the same as my example. "Yippee Ki Yay Mo" and then kill Gabriel! OK! it was very amazing shot but it is too easy and corny. I was very surprised how Maggie Q showed her skill in the movie but the henchman must has the worst death rather than their boss? Is the Die Hard 4 crew think about this fact? Oh my god! Why they didn't kill Gabriel by stabbed the quill through his eye? If you saw Die Hard 1 and 2. That's the way Die Hard 4 should be. The blast of action, the reasonable plot and the great ending. Why Die Hard 4 forgot the last one? John McClane did himself like "The big old cat" in the last 10 minutes of the movie. For God Sake! McClane is the hero! He is the great! for 105 minutes but in last 10 minutes. Oh my god! he looked very weak! We didn't see any silly like this. Die Hard 1 - 3 didn't show how John McClane weakened but Die Hard 4 do it. Thomas Gabriel could be happy that he is the only man who can make John McClane "The big old cat". Did our IMDb viewer understand my explanation? The weak McClane and the silly death of Thomas Gabriel is the reason why I told you this is not really "Die Hard".
I accepted that the blast of action and the reasonable plot still in this Die Hard 4 but the great ending is miss. Maybe Len Wiseman or the production crew, especially the scriptwriter or screenplay writer forgot this fact. They use intense of action, drama and thrilling at first but use the silly, corny and unreasonable at last. I have to tell everyone I voted 5 out of 10 because they have the blast of action and the great plot. If you have the great ending, it will not at 5 points!