Did this movie accurately or inaccurately portray the end of slavery

Rating: 7/10 (29 November 2015)

After watching the movie Lincoln, I firmly believe that the movie inaccurately portrays of ending slavery. Many people believe there is only ONE side of ending slavery; the Emancipation Proclamation or the blacks themselves. Why does it have to be one or the other? This movie shows one side, and that side is the Emancipation Proclamation (13th amendment). Its shows the struggles of getting the votes to get it passed and the struggles along with it; like Lincoln's wife unstable mental state and family problems. The problems are that they do not show the blacks side, but it make sense because it's called Lincoln and it's about Lincoln. A professor Eric Foner points out that "slavery died on the ground as well as in the House.."(http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/149664). Foner explains that slavery ended on the fighting ground of the civil war and also in the House with the voters. Another reason why it was inaccurate is because it doesn't mention Frederick Douglass, Elizabeth Keckley, and Mary Todd. These people were big black roles of ending slavery but were not mentioned. I wish they opened up a little more or even make a movie of the slave ending slavery and I bet there is and I will find it and will watch it.
One example of inaccurately from movie is the first scene, when Lincoln is sitting under a tent and is talking to the two black solider. Then two white young soldiers come over and start saying his speech and then one of the black soldiers finish as they marched away to go to call. This scene never existed in real life, but I believe they created this to show a "bond" between him and blacks, but it never happen.
Even though the movie had many inaccuracies I believe it was great movie to watch, but being a firm believer I do not believe the Emancipation Proclamation/13th amendment/ Lincoln fully ended slavery.