Visually beautiful, with low rated philosophy and symbolism

Rating: 6/10 (22 February 2013)

Almost as dumb and overrated as Paulo Cohelo's books for barely literate housewives, without being as ugly as he is.
Faith, religious tolerance, formally a parable. An attempt to explain them through a metaphor. That's all very well, but did you need to water it down with Pepsi in order to make sure even dumb kids would get the hint? Sorry, the philosophical and religious concept was too simple to deserve such gorgeous photography (awesome). Overall entertaining, though.
Photography/CGI : 10, simply outstanding.
Acting : 7, nobody felt cheesy nor out of place.
Scenic concept : 8, a whole movie in a dingy, nice. Almost as radical as Hitchcock's Rear Window.
Script : 7, never boring, always entertaining
Philosophy : 2 (good for the illiterate, maybe)
Symbolism : 2 (only soap opera lovers can be impressed)
10+7+8+7+2+2/6 = 6
I am so annoyed by easy 10s that I was honestly tempted to slip in a 1 to lower the ratings, but I'll pass. It'd feel uncomfortable to end up in the same group of cheaters.
A 10 should imply perfection, shouldn't it? If you give Pi 10/10 what is your rating for, say, "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"? 270/10?
This is a good film, I suggest at least a go. Hardly a milestone, tho.
Visually beautiful and dumb enough to win Oscars.