from Hollywood's product line

Rating: 1/10 (1 September 2008)

This may not be the worst movie I've ever seen. I am surprised to see those "good" ratings and comments. What is good about this movie? actions? music? cliché words? special effects? the crane's meticulous feather? You can find them in any other animations. Probably this one could have been called good if it had been made thirty years ago. This is simply one of those products from Hollywood's product line. The director tried to make it special by putting a panda as the hero. Yet that makes no difference. The panda and his father and his teacher and his colleague and his neighbors, they are just as same as those character you can find in every other dreamwork's stuff. Sorry. The first one they made was glorious, the second one was a movie, the third one was just a piece of junk. This would be a sign of the end of road if their films went on like this. Or a culture bomb to make people idiots.