1 Was SO much better

Rating: Null/10 (23 August 2011)

I fast forwarded ... i think 5 times. I'm not even exactly sure why. It's boring. Kung Fu Panda 1 was great ! , original, funny, even very nice action scenes. oh, and good graphics & music.
This one is mildly funny, action not really convincing, and the story kind of ridiculous. A Peacock With A Cannon. against Kung Fu ? A giant Cannon against a martial art ? really ? that's like comparing tomatoes to national taxes. or something. And ANOTHER thing. I read this (among other things) in other peoples review: "While the camera's capture the action, the music that plays during every scene has been selected to bring out the emotions of the scene and make you feel it deep in your heart." This guy get payed for saying that ? All over the reviews I read this. REALLY people, Part 2 now has the same rating as Part 1. You don't actually think that ? I'm not saying this movie isn't entertaining.. but the first one is the better, everyone should agree opn that , right ????
This one then: "Magnificent flash animation in the intro " Really ? DID you see the animation of the first ? check them again, after each other, and you can't possibly think there in the same league . Really. In any case, there is corporate advertisement going on here. These are not actual opinions. .. in my opinion ;) Lastly: " Kung Fu Panda 2 was put together with such a degree of excellence that it rivals many Pixar movies" Anyway, readers, pls judge.
Nr 1: fantastic ! Part 2 : mediocre , 4 out of 10.