Wheres tom cruise, or would it then have been too obvious?

Rating: 3/10 (28 May 2012)

The problem is the film is just plain scientology propaganda, without this it would be a half decent flick. With it, same as the 'religion or should i say sect' its a bag full of holes. A MIT astrophysics professor who puts determinism in his class as a scientific subject, yeah they wish. But even if you bypass this scientology product placement the story is still full of holes, like can somebody explain me why Lucinda had this premonitions, to then let them be sealed away for 50 years. Or why has caleb the urge to again write down this numbers at the end, can somebody just tell me why they were written at all if at the end the aliens still have to kidnap the kids to bring them to the location (oh yeah forgot already scientology)? And i liked the fact that major traumas in kids like loosing your parents can be easily fixed by just giving them a fluffy white bunny. The same with Cage, your kid just left you with some Alien/Angels + the world is about to end but hey lets have a little nap on the ground. Why the stones whats there story? Nice was also that apparently caleb was able to switch off the voices in his head by turning of his hearing aid. Do people in America always leave there keys in the engine at gas stations? And our brilliant profesor is able from a random list to extract dates and number of victims (remarcable at least) but then fails to see the rest are coordinates. And so on and on. The three is for the first half where at least they got some atmosphere and some nice cgi.