It would be a blessing if the AUDIENCE experienced the end first

Rating: 2/10 (18 March 2013)

This disaster just had to be written by a committee, divided into three groups. The first group wrote the beginning; the second, the middle, etc. But they weren't allowed to consult with each other. And nobody was allowed to have a final say when it was all pieced together.
I've never before seen a high-end movie that began with "this is interesting," to "why is he behaving this way," to "this doesn't seem to make sense," to "Huh? This is silly," to "This is ridiculous," to, finally, "This is just laughably plain stupid!" And the ending, which should finally and hopefully tie everything together and make sense of what has been going on, just adds to the idiocy and makes everything that happened before even more ridiculous.
I didn't bother to look, but this movie should have earned a lot of people a Razzie Award, including the caterer who should have been embarrassed and ashamed to be responsible for feeding the actors and crew.
Seems to me anybody who wrote a highly favorable rating must have been close friends or family to those involved. Or perhaps by those who are owed a lot of money by those involved and want it back with a good box office.