sorry, but...

Rating: Null/10 (15 February 2015)

i had to dig through lots of the 'overkill'(not just physical violence) to enjoy the movie... if i didn't know any better i'd say they were trying too hard. but i DO know better. they got some people in the seats(the 'respectable' ones who are a bit openminded, at least)with colin firth and michael caine...got the Tarantino crowd into the seats with samuel l. and kept that 'teenage' British boy in the seat with all the over the top stuff. by the time the respectables realized they'd been conned, they were covered in all sorts of blood and innards. after a while i don't even notice the expletives...i'm from b'klyn. my mother spoke that way. in fact, she had a job teaching sailors how to swear. i understand it as emotional punctuation. lots don't. they see it as disrespect. forest? meet tree... while i'm on the subject...people...when are you going to realize that words are just sounds. it's the inTENT that's important. and studies have shown that verbal language comprises 7% of communication. seven precent. kinda the definition of 'tunnel vision', wouldn't you think? so some person at the studio who kinda handicapped the demographics deserves, at least, a pat on the back... i imagine the profits of this movie will justify their method/s. don't get me wrong. there were parts/elements of this film that i enjoyed. but, overall, it was a case for me of less is more.