Kill Bill Better Than Blade Runner???

Rating: 3/10 (28 December 2006)

I was just looking through the IMDb top 100. How could a silly flick like Kill Bill score higher on the list than Blade Runner? What a joke. Kill Bill doesn't even belong in the same list.
Kill Bill was a completely disconnected and silly movie with little substance, coherence or cohesiveness. It is more of a shaggy dog joke than a movie.
I can't imaging what criteria people are voting on. Is it just all the gore and ridiculous stunts? It can't be plot, story or acting, because then it wouldn't be in the list. It can't be plausibility or incorporation of interesting or novel concepts. What is it?