What's worse than "awful"?

Rating: 1/10 (2 November 2003)

This movie is swill. A linear, boring plot; weak, silly dialog; self-conscious, odd editing; poor acting--especially the poorly-cast Uma Thurman; and that's the good part. That remainder of this review, which I'll truncate in the interest of self-restraint, deals with the subject of this trash. It appeals to the basest components of the culture that has been created by the visual media, exploits those ugly forces and allows QT to laugh all the way to the bank, which I am certain was his only purpose. Fortunately, he's done such a poor job, proving once again that he's a two-and-out moviemaker, that he'll lose his butt on this garbage, ensuring that we needn't endure volume 2.
At least I can hope.