disappointment

Rating: 5/10 (2 June 2020)

I actually like DC superhero comics very much. Some people say that superheroes are the mythological stories of this era. In fact, DC heroes are more "divine" and more like gods than Marvel's. Specific to the story of the Justice League, the fall and resurrection of Superman, and the assembly of the Justice League, this can be told (or even supposed to be) a story about the annihilation and remodeling of faith. There is much to talk about here. The constructed conflict can profoundly shape the character image. But Warner always has the ability to smash a good hand. It perfectly wastes all the above mentioned, and makes a movie whose plot is comparable to the animation.
The words "deep" are the advantages of DC comics and animations, and the advantages of the Nolan version of Batman, but they are never the advantages of DCEU. Because in fact, DCEU movies have never shot "deep", and all of the shots are "although everyone knows that I actually have no connotation but just pretend, but I still have to make a deep look" The question of DCEU is never whether it should be deep or funny, but that this group of creators has not told a story that is reasonable and conflicting, the characters are credible, and all aspects are not rigid.
Even if it's a laugh, it's not so good. This is normal, and humor requires IQ. There are a lot of laughs in this film, some of them are not bad, but the overall feeling is too hard. Some of the laughing points are actually destroying the existence of the drama. For example, when the Super League later said to the master: "I know you don't like me", the master likes a little girl to support my incoherent words, so as to create a laugh and "sweet "This joke is too low-level, this rot is too low-level, because it comes at the cost of destroying the image of the old man. The most fascinating way to make a group of "CP" must be to never just show it off. Because the attractive premise of "CP" is that the two images that make up CP are charming. It's stupid to show off CP's image without sacrificing image.
There is another huge problem with this movie: it portrays Batman very badly. The master is a very special character. He is the only mortal in this group of gods. His absolute strength and other people in the Justice League have an insurmountable gap, but he has a core position in this team. This point is actually very important. Here you can fully dig into how a mortal man has found his place among the gods, how to view his own value, and can even create a very wonderful conflict from this, and perfect it by solving this conflict. The character of the old man. Even if you are limited in space, you can't talk about it deeply. However, no, there is no intention to write a deep article at all. The movie finally shows that the Flash is very funny, Wonder Woman is beautiful, the Neptune muscle is very good, Batman is very weak, nothing more. The audience's expectation is "Look at how this film prevents Batman from appearing embarrassed because of his weakness", and the movie was shot out as "haha, Batman is so embarrassed, we even made it a laugh!"
I have always been angry about DC movies. It has a lot of good stories, extremely profound characters, and all the actors are beautiful in appearance and good in business. Unfortunately, Warner has never let people down. After I watched Thor 3, I felt bad because it completely gave up the slightly pursued opportunity and was willing to make an excellent assembly line product; while the Justice League's badness refers to it as an assembly line product, and it is not good.