Interesting as an update of Jurassic Park, but not in itself

Rating: 4/10 (12 January 2016)

As an update of Jurassic Park, we can see a lot of characteristics of modern time (not just in movies, mind you):
1. Technology has improved, but not fundamentally
2. Acting has degraded, mostly into over-acting
3. Thrills (mostly cheap) are more important than cohesion, logic and all that boring stuff that make a good story
4. In any significantly large organization, you must have a woman in a position of significant power
What we have is a thrilling amusement park ride transferred to the big screen. There's some fun to have, there are a few funny jokes, but, the story is really weak, and not just because it's yet-another-rehash of the "here be dinosaurs" theme.
I also disagree with some reviewers who seem to imply that Jeff Goldblum or Sam Neil could have made much difference. Some, sure, but, it's too big of a ride to be saved by a few good men (or women), it has too much inertia.