What a terrible, terrible movie.

Rating: 3/10 (24 June 2015)

Chris Pratt is the only redeeming feature of the poorly written flick. The script and screenplay give way to ever more impressive special effects; but as much as the effects are important, all they should be are the roof to an otherwise sturdy house. If you want a formulaic movie that is fit for the 7-10 year old bracket this is probably the ticket. The characters couldn't be more stereotyped if they tried.
I got the feeling that Mr Pratt twigged to the fact that this was based on a poor screenplay and therefore did an amazing job at underplaying his role (as much as the director did try and set him up with such clichéd scenes); my hat goes off to him (genuinely).
I am trying to find something positive to say however all I can say are: *the cinematography was good *the effects were very good *scenery was impressive
other than that - utter pants