better CGI, but more boring than original.

Rating: 7/10 (17 June 2015)

I wanted at first to see it on 34st, but decided to go over to 42st.Times Square just because there is finally something to eat there with all the new burger joints. The price was $15, the theater was maybe some 75% full, it was a 3:30pm showing, I chose the center isle with the walk way. The screen wasn't as big as the one on 34st, which is disappointing.
The biggest sin that a movie could commit is bore me, and boy was I bored by 'Jurassic World'. Haven't we just seen monsters battle each other last year in 'Godzilla'? Ironically, right after returning home from the movies, I turned on HBO and it was on!
I thought 'Jurassic World' would be a re-boot, pretending the original movies did not exist and just start all over again; but, nope, it was some yet another re-built park with better tech. Oh, yes, the movie did have some fancy gee-weez CGI, fx, graphics, tech, or whatever else you wish to call a movie that has style over substance and a plot. As for the plot, well, parents send their kids to a dino park, where as if right on cue, a dino goes nuts, escapes, and starts killing. I got a feeling that we've seen this all before many times.
The bad dino in fact never existed but is a fake genetic splice, so it has long arms and some mutations. I reckon if dinos could be made for zoos and parks why not splice apes&humans to make soldiers or slave servants to do dirty work like construction?! Oh, because we'll get another 'Planet of the Apes' sequel.
I could not understand a word that Arab fellow said, in fact I gave up on following any dialogue and just watched the fights. At the end the movie got lots of applause, and from me as well which is rare, not because it was really good, but because the fx were.