Jurassic World doesn't disappoint

Rating: 10/10 (5 October 2016)

For those that complain 'Jurassic World' is just another dinosaur-eating-people movie, then they should have gone to see another movie. If you go to a Jurassic movie, expect dinosaurs, people, and dinosaurs eating people. For those expecting something different should have gone to see something different then. Now that my rant is over, I can go on to rave about how good this movie is. Jurassic World takes places approximately 22 years after the events of the first Jurassic Park movie. The park, a fully functioning amusement park and resort, is everything that was envisioned in the glory days. Trying to keep the interests of the audience, the lab scientists create a hybrid dinosaur called the indominus rex, which of course wreaks havoc on the park as the creators and employees of the park try to prevent it from eating (too many) people. Chris Pratt delivers a believable and exciting performance as a Navy soldier who was hired on to help train the velociraptors. He brings humor without forcing it, but also can bring the seriousness to it at the same time, which is what makes it believable. Opposite him stars Bryce Dallas Howard, a no-nonsense career woman trying to keep the park from falling apart and also find her nephews, who came to visit and spend time and of course, get caught up in the whole dinosaur-on-the-loose shenanigan. I give this movie this rating because I got exactly what I was looking for- a dinosaur movie that is entertaining, keeps me on the edge of my seat, and not distracted with poor acting or graphics. Again, if you're expecting to go see this movie and see something different then Jurassic events, then go spend your money on something else. Jurassic World gives you exactly what's in the title, so there should not be any surprises for a dinosaur to run loose and eat people.