Jurassic World acquires nostalgia to cover its actual rating.

Rating: 4/10 (28 June 2015)

It's been fourteen years since the last Jurassic Park film and over twenty years since the first one. I say this because I feel as if people are letting nostalgia mask the actual quality of this film. While not being a horrible film it is still a flawed story with sub par acting, cliché dialogue, some shameless product placement, scenes that serve no progression for the story other then stuffing for the time limit and inconsistent quality of the special effects.
While those traits listed above make it sound as if this would be no more than an extensive waste of time. This is not the case however as there are a scant amount of scenes that are entertaining enough to hold this film up to standards. The ending being culpable for the most enticing part of the whole film (unfortunately only lasting no more than fifteen minutes).
This feature still disappoints me as while first film was more focused on the characters interactions with one another and their thoughts on the park Hammond wanted to show the world (something real that people could touch as explained in his flea circus speech), this sequel mainly focused on the Indominus Rex with its stereotyped characters interrupting the flow of his story.
Would this be a film to see in the theaters? If you're a fan of Jurassic park I would recommend that you give it a chance but to also judge it as a standalone piece and not on references to the first Jurassic Park. If you are one who takes films with more judgement than its best too skip and wait for a DVD release or Netflix stream.