People say this is bad? That it is 'better' than Jurassic Park III?

Rating: 8/10 (16 June 2015)

I will say this once, and only once... This movie was great, and it was not just another attempt to make money.
I just saw it and I didn't know what to expect. Mostly because almost everyone said it was a terrible movie. I disagree.
It was better than Jurassic Park III, but when I do, I am not criticizing that movie. It was great as well. My thoughts are that everyone thinks that if it is not as good as the first film, it is not worthy of a decent rating. Also that if not perfect, it is a bad movie. Again, I disagree.
Of course it has problems. How many movies are there that are spot on perfect. No, it is NOT perfect. That doesn't mean you give it a terrible review and rating. If the raptors changing sides so quickly is your problem with the movie, you are right. That doesn't make sense. Don't act like this ruined the movie.
If you think they could have picked better actors, I don't see your problem with the actors they already had. They were fine. No, they didn't put Samuel L. Jackson or Morgan Freeman in this movie. Who cares?
Another thing I see is that the script was fine. I saw nothing in it to make this a bad movie. No, it wasn't perfect. Nothing is.
The movie wasn't as good as the first Jurassic Park, but it was better than Jurassic Park III, and phenomenally better than the second installment, The Lost World.