Better effects, better movie?

Rating: 6/10 (14 June 2015)

It's clear to see when a film is a cash grab; big cast, big effects and an already established name always helps. It seems like the "Jurassic" franchise worked its way onto this bus a while back and never stepped off. It's a shame to say that even by today's movie standards "Jurassic World" wasn't the end of the road for the series, even today's CGI couldn't save it (Might have even been what killed it?).
This film is a stellar example as to why rehashing and rebooting movies doesn't work when you don't change anything... Now actually, that's not fair really, I mean this film did change things, for starts it removed nearly all the practical effects we cherished in the original, it also featured a lot more running (Because why not), it aimed to make dinosaurs more human and more relatable (Clearly because the first movie shamed them so much) and I almost forgot (Probably because it's so insignificant) the films called "Jurassic World" not "Jurassic Park".
To be honest though I knew what to expect, I think most people knew this franchise had been going nowhere since they went to the pictures in 1997. So I can't rate it really badly because that would assume that I expected this film to be great and I didn't. It was actually a great average film, nothing more nothing less, well maybe a bit less.
Conclusion: What you see is what you get, you don't like it, well...