On Second viewing this movie suck

Rating: 2/10 (11 October 2019)

If you read through the reviews it is mainly two fractions arguing.
Fraction one claim Joaquin is fantastic, this movie is the best thing since sliced bread, and the only question is how many Oscars it should win.
Fraction two argues that this is basically a copy paste movie and it stands on two (or three) previous gigants and the director is a lazy hack.
I agree with almost all of that, both sides. Joaquin is great, and the movie is decently made, but it is also stolen and copy pasted and on a second viewing the movie get very boring, and most of it make little to no sense anymore.
On second viewing focusing on details you notice a lot of mistakes and a lot of the dialogue which is surprisingly bad.
And Oscars? Please! I think many in the committee think as many others do and personally I do not think they should reward copy paste movies with almost zero originality with trophies.
The main issue I have with this movie is, seemingly opposite almost everyone else, is that I feel it is too short. They never fully develop all the side characters, the Joker is almost the only focus, which sort of work due to great acting, but if you are going to really 100% care about the protagonist he/she also need to face up against something, and the surrounding need to matter. This movie develops and show Joker, that it is. This is a one-man show and a psychological downward spiral, which is fine, but not something to build an entire movie on.
Anyone claiming this is a masterpiece have never seen a movie before. Or they are lying to you.
This is not as bad as Alita or as horrible as Us, I would put this on par with that awful Endgame movie. 2/10.