Compare it to movies in it's group (3rd sequels)

Rating: 7/10 (15 August 2013)

I'm way behind on this I know guys. I just never was too interested in this. But all my friends saw it and half of them told me it sucked and it was terrible and then the other half told me it was great, that it was better than the first two.
Well, neither of those statements are true.
I don't understand all the hate. It was fine. Better than Spiderman 3. I don't know really how to review this other than just saying it's better than "these movies" and saying that it's really not that bad. The action was good. The story wasn't cheesy, which is always good in a super hero movie. And for anyone upset of the ending of the movie by Tony Starks decision, I'm sure that it'll all be resolved in "The Avengers"
It was not terrible. I'd say it's better than the second but not as good as the first. It's a decent super hero movie. Better than "Wolverine" just because the plot isn't stupid. I did however, think the president in danger was a little cliché. Cliché, NOT terrible.
It was a disappointment to hear that the mandarin, Iron Man's greatest foe, was a floozy.
But you have to compare it to other movies in it's group.