At last a "real" sci-fi movie!

Rating: 9/10 (8 February 2015)

"Real" sci-fi is a very rare standard indeed, as only sci-fi fans actually use it. For anyone else, "sci-fi" just means a story located in the future, whatever the story tells or how it says it.
Actually, sci-fi means "science"-fiction, so science has to be a primordial part of the story. If you have spaceships, aliens, space battles or whatever, but no mention of science anywhere, it's not sci-fi (yes, that means Star Wars is not "real" sci-fi).
Unfortunately, "real" sci-fi movies are very few out there, because it means many people would not understand important parts of the movie, so less moneys for the production. 2001 was such a movie, a few, but not so many, since then.
In this movie, Nolan made a masterpiece of science-fiction, with a story where the very basis of the story is science: without it, no story! And you are not directly confronted to it, he gives it to you piece by piece, so that you don't choke on it.
As a result, some may find it boring, and too long. I didn't. Nolan didn't put any "true" action scene in there, but really beautiful photography in bigger-than-life space- or landscapes.
So, to sum this up: it's a very good and very beautiful movie, but those who don't like science, and have a minimum of knowledge in physics won't like it, at all.