Doesn't deserve to be great.

Rating: 4/10 (12 November 2014)

First of all, I understand Chris Nolan as a new talent and he is an intelligent filmmaker. Since Memento, he has not disappointed me. This movie doesn't have a befitting title. It is hardly about interstellar stuff but more about the movie of so called bonding with father-daughter. I have seen some of the most intriguing movies ever like psycho 1960, Last Year at Marienbad 1962, Dial M for Murder, Strangers on the Train, Dark City and other masterpieces like 2001:Space Odyssey 1968. Also some of best work of past century. I have also seen many cheap, horrible and "not great" movies. I think Christopher Nolan has ripped off many scene from other movies. I have seen many shots already been used in other movies. The originality is not there.
What I liked in this movie:- Decent acting, good production, good screenplay,
What I didn't like in this movie:- Confused theories, generic soundtrack, OK..visual effects, lengthy as hell, bad attempts to rip off exact same shots as in 2001:Space Odyssey, miserable ending, nonstop funny quips, OK sound mixing and editing and so on. The movie all the time refers to "they" but who is this "they" is not cleared up. Chris Nolan just made up stuff out of his imagination like black hole is supposed to be like this, wormhole is supposed to be like this. As I know, wormholes cannot be seen but they might be created by some future advaced gadgets or machines. There cannot be any disturbance in wormhole.No any"they" can do that(if can explain..how??). The Spaceship they travel into doesn't say a thing about how they travelled to The Saturn without burning any fuel. If the circle structure had solar panels around it, then I could buy it(but sun doesn't heat farther planets like Saturn so I won't). Too much funny quips as I said. Some scenes feel serious with some spooky shots but the next thing, you know, some funny quote. Big dialogs like, "saving millions", "saving the humanity" blah blah but make stupid progress. The world and surrounding is established by dirt clouds and that is it. No profound setup of the world. Matt Damon is "shoehorned" completely to get audience's tension. Other half of the movie is not about the mission anymore. It is confused all in itself. How Matthew got back on earth ? Blackhole could lead him anywhere but earth but he comes back ? Is he hallucinating like Dave was in 2001: Space Odyssey ? Also how did that Murph survived the earth's atmosphere for over a good healthy century(oh she was on Saturn or whatever!!) Time and Gravity were not shown correlated with each other in a deeper way. I admit that Chris Nolan had done some research about gravity and time so he could somehow calculate the time spent two planets or he is clearly bluffing.
I loved some great stuff like that 4 or 7 dimensional (don't remember but maybe 5) design but I don't know if it is a exactly or remotely likely. But who put it there? "They"?I reviewed this movie as exactly how I understood so the review is a little messy. I gave a lot much thinking but I could not understand some stuff. This movie could be a great one if they cut some things and added more meaning and story. By the way, that TAR-S(S-TAR) was a refrigerator with a continuous writing on his monitor without matching with what he was speaking and no robot can be like that..ever. It was a good thought though.
I just saw a movie months ago called Edge of Tomorrow and that made sense more with a good story. I am mentioning that because I have seen about 2000 movies and based on that experience I can say that this one is not so great. Watch a review by Jeremy Jahns on Youtube, you will get it.
Watch Gravity 2013. It was a lot better. If that guy directed Interstellar then it had the potential to be great but Nolan makes Love quantifiable.
In my mind, I give 4/10 but as I am not writing this to myself but to general people I give it a 7/10.