Science in this movie is pluasible.

Rating: 10/10 (10 April 2015)

reading some of the reviews, i can see people have issues with the science behind the movie. the science does seem implausible to the low educated mind, and it also seems implausible to the phd internet physicists. but in actual fact the movie represents black holes the best way it can, the most accurate version to date of any movie. sure beyond the event horizon the 5D tesseract might seem ridiculous, but know one knows what behind the event horizon, for all we know, no laws of nature even exist, or the laws of nature become one in tangled among it self. who knows? so Nolan had complete freedom on the black hole scene.
onto the wormhole scene, wormholes are mathematical possibilities. its even explained in the movie (wormholes are not naturally arising phenomena), and any recreation of what a wormhole looks like is at best an wild guesstimate. so again Nolan has wiggle room here as well.
the science in this movie is pretty sound, so any issues people have is probably due to there science illiteracy.
there are a few niggling faults, Brands character is almost emotionally vacuum. but for the most part its a great showcase of the unknown, or the unknowable. there are several mouth dropping scenes, and a few tear jerker moments. its really best experienced on the big screen, and if you ever get the chance to watch it on IMAX, i advise you take it.
There have been also a few comparisons to 2001, i think interms of pace this movie far out does 2001, I've watched 2001 several time, through out different stages of my life, and it certainly isn't about my patience, but 2001 is unbelievably slow, but i can still appreciate it for its class in its day, but should in no way be considered on par to interstellar on today's standards.
i would recommend watching this movie on a large screen, but a blu ray would suffice for a decent viewing experience. you should watch with little to no distractions for best experience, as this movie will require all your attention.
note: if you have issues with the science in the movie, consult stephen hawking, brian cox, neil degrasse tyson and kip thorn. these uneducated people endorse most of the science and maths behind the movie.