Thought it was a visual epic film but shooting on film is not a necessary anymore

Rating: Null/10 (9 November 2014)

SPOILER Don't READ _ INTERSTELLAR REVIEW. _I have very mixed feeling after seeing Nolan's Interstellar. Yes it was a visually epic film, dealing with death, our existence, love and I think the main plot the theory of relativity. I also was thankful it wasn't preachy about a God being in that equation for the main plot or i would of walked out. So much was going on, and even tho i didn't feel the "experience" even more on IMAX, I get it, it was shot on film, although i think it really didn't matter for the average film goer cause first of all, its Nolan, and second with all the production put into this film, he could shot of a DSLR and made it as epic. It was a long movie and at time it thought where is this going and with hints of M Nights Signs, and Kubrick's aesthetic of 2001, yes all the elements to expel an epic tale were happening in real time and it was a great ride. My age is showing just thinking about Dylan Thomas's quote "Do not go gentle into that good night" that was in this movies main theme but all i could think of was Rodney Dangerfield Back To School. Kids looks it up. One thing that pulled me out just like in Gravity, is the Clooney affect, too many good looking actors in space. I mean when I saw Matt Damon stuck on another planet, yea I was like, cm on whats next, Ryan Goslin on Mars?.Also, I do like that the idea that love can transcend time and space and "GRAVITY" but in this film i felt love was the buffer, love doesn't answer the main question which after watching the film, i was left with. We die, and our existence isn't based on just love, but survival. but then i guess there wouldn't of been a film, just a film of trying saving Earth fighting Aliens again. Would I watch it again, yes but id have to make sure i have 4 hours available to do it again.