Why Mr. should release a shorter Directors cut

Rating: 8/10 (2 April 2015)

So I just watched Interstellar now for the second time on blu-ray, and I think I have an idea, why there is a big hole in the movie and how it could be avoided. On the extras of the bluray they don't stop pointing out how scientifically accurate interstellar is, but at one point they throw all logic over board, and I don't mean the trip in the black hole. Its just after they leave the worm hole and consider which planet they should visit first. They go for the one thats closest to the black hole and were time runs 60.000 times as slow as on earth. thats one hour in seven years. But if this is known to the crew, wouldn't everyone go for the other planets first, even if it would take months to get there? secondly if the time on the planet runs so slow, wouldn't the gravity be several magnitudes higher, so that nobody could walk around there? and would time go as nearly as slow in the capsule in the orbit as on the planets surface so the left behind crew couldn't grow old so quickly? My solution for this problem is, just cut out 15 minutes where they visit the water planet, re-film a short sequence in the capsule where they decide to go to the ice planet first and everyone is fine. The could explain that murph got old just by explaining that time slowed down for them when they passed the worm hole. By cutting out the water planet, Intestellar would lose its largest logic hole, would get a bit more focused pace and make it to the end credits in 150 minutes. another thing is the use of the imax camera. it produces magnificent pictures and the mobile version was even small enough to film inside cars. but why didn't they use it for the whole film? now we have the annoying switching from letterbox to imax and back. next time i would like to see a complete scifi flick in imax.