why can't we vote zero stars?

Rating: 1/10 (26 February 2011)

this really needs to be addressed ... movies like this one don't deserve any stars at all ... but we're forced to give it at least one ...
this movie is not only flat as day old soda, it is boring ... BORING ... oh yes Tarantino kills and scalps and does his usual crap but please, you still need a story ... this is nothing but inane dialogue coupled with a tired 'alternate' history ... completely worthless ... i really don't know why i keep wasting my time on his movies ... he hasn't had anything worth watching since 'pulp fiction' ... that's from 1994 folks ... so that makes two outstanding movies he made ... 'reservoir dogs' and 'pulp fiction' ... two ... the rest are average at best and, as with this one, just plain terrible but once you've had a hit in Hollywood, all you need to do is keep making movies that make money ... they don't care if they're good ... just keep bringing in the bank ... why people keep paying for crap like this is beyond me ... it took me two years to get around to convincing myself to try this movie ... and I'm p*ssed because it wasted two hours of my life ...
that's the last time Tarantino ... you won't waste any more of my life with your tired pointless crap