Ranks with Ironman2 for worst picture of 2010

Rating: 3/10 (4 August 2010)

First, let me say that ALL the Actors, but one, were fantastic, and the one that wasn't, had a language/enunciation problem. (half the time he spoke you couldn't understand what he said)
But good actors (and believe me they did their damnedest!)can't make up for a wandering script with poor suspension of disbelief.
Just when something needed expounding or explanation, the script would jump to a different scenario.
And the sound!
I guess the editor thinks that when you push the volume, no-one will notice how the villains (the "projections") have no identity (individually OR in groups) for the audience to hate (OR love.)
So loud during the bombings and shoot-'em-ups, I had to plug in my ear- buds.
This movie could have been the best of the year with INTELLIGENT rewriting, editing, and minus the actor with questionable language skills.
Instead, it was nonsense.
I can not believe IMDb's 9.2/10 rating. I smell a rat. I guess if Congressmen and Senators take bribes, why not IMDb "payola"!