Pretty good movie, and not as bad as the critics think it is

Rating: Null/10 (30 October 2011)

Critics these days have gotten pretty stupid, and clearly do not understand this movie. It's as if they read the book "Animal Farm" and started nitpicking things like "Animals can't talk! Animal's don't know how to cooperate! Animals can't wear clothes! This book sucks! Huge plot holes!" without realizing that it was actually a metaphor/criticism of communism. Similarly, In Time is a metaphor/criticism of capitalism, but instead of animals we have good-looking 25-year-olds. There, I explained the movie for you dumb critics and I hope you can enjoy it now.
The movie is an extremely good criticism of capitalism. It hits all the main points, and is pretty relevant for 2011 considering the recession and the OWS protests. Besides the intellectual goodness, it looks good as well. All the actors are good looking and sharply dressed. The sets and props are retro-futuristic. The special effects are good. Dumb critics seem to nitpick one scene (which I won't mention), but what they should be paying attention to was the glowing green tattoos that appeared all over, because I'm pretty sure those were all CGI, which was probably complex due to all the green light scattered.
So overall a pretty good movie. Compared to recent movies I have scene, I would say that this was much better than Transformers DotM or The Adjustment Bureau, both of which sucked terribly, but not as good a X-Men First class, which was very good.