Egnore the fact it stars Timberlake. "In time" is great!

Rating: 9/10 (7 December 2011)

Why all the hate? I thought "In time" was very good. Although I want too hate Justin Timberlake, I can't fault him as an actor, and too tell you the truth, I've been impressed with most off the movies I've seen him in (I have too say even his music, though not my kind off thing, is good for what it is).
I Believe that Timberlakes presence is perhaps what has cursed "In time." An otherwise original movie, that sci-fi fans should be lapping up. Maybe it would off done better if it starred someone the average bloke thinks is cooler, but for now it's probably a film guys are getting dragged too by their girlfriends. If my girlfriend had dragged me along too see this though, I'd off been glad, because it's entertaining.
Maybe I'm too overwhelmed with excitement when something is actually "original" these days (it does cause me too dish out a high rating straight away) but the unique premise off this flick is what people who didn't particularly enjoy it even admit too it having. Judging it by everything else that's in it though, I still think it's good. It's got a good cast, some half decent (though small amount of) action, and even uses the way clocks are always counting down in the movie too add some extra excitement too it. Plus Amanda Seyfried looks great in it. Oooft!
"In time" also doesn't overdo it with the way the future that is represented here looks, meaning it will age reasonably well. Even though it hasn't been that highly praised now (people complain that it's not explained how these people off the future are the way they are, even though it clearly says that they have been genetically engineered this way at the beginning) I can see it becoming a cult classic off sorts in the future.