IMDb users have made poor ratings a bad habit.

Rating: 10/10 (16 March 2014)

Before bypassing this movie, please bear in mind that most of the negative reviews have inaccurate information. Based on what I've read, the naysayers had trouble understanding what happened beyond the first 30 minutes of the movie. Their failure to follow the plot does not mean that the movie was poorly executed, it means that the plot was too complex for those without vivid imaginations. There were no plot holes. Many events and circumstances in this movie can be explained by sociology and common sense. In example, a vacant room with 2 seats was not necessarily staged, it was likely the hiding space for someone in a similar situation. Does the director really have to explain something so basic? Does the screenwriter really need to think for the viewer? The characters explained their motives throughout the movie. So those with complaints about fairness to the rich should simply rewind or watch it again. There is no viable excuse for rating this movie below a 7 for the plot alone. Then points should be added for artistic design, realism, and intensity.