An insult to the horror genre

Rating: 1/10 (22 December 2007)

Unbelievable, I saw this movie with a friend we wanted to see walk hard but it wasn't out till the day after. I didn't expect much but this was one of the WORST HORROR MOVIES OF ALL TIME!!! I'll sum it up, it was a rip off of 28 days later with some plot changes (probably so they wouldn't get sued). I know 28 days obviously got there ideas from george romero but it was way too close to 28 days. I expected will smith to act like more of an egotistical jerk like usual but actually he wasn't the annoying thing about the movie. Not one person put on zombie makeup in this movie, NOT ONE, which sucks all the fun out of it, because the zombies in this looked SOOOO fake. I believed Roger Rabbit was playing opposite a live cast more than these zombies. I can stand some cg but every zombie was bad super fake looking cg, this movie actually looks worse than the mummy cg (or about the same). I didn't believe one scene there zombies were in, therefore it couldn't possibly be even remotely menacing or scary. Is it that hard to do it old school with real people? They certainly had the budget for it. The 28 guys and Romero can do it. Forget this and rent a good horror movie, the mind boggling part is I expected like 3 star rating on here for this movie, who's giving this piece good reviews is everyone blind. The bad thing is this review is from someone who actually likes Star Wars Episode 2 & 3, which while it did have too much cg, still looked 100 times more convincing than this one. This movie was pathetic and whoever directed it deserves a sh*t sandwich.
Nathan