a geek guys criticism of a decent movie

Rating: Null/10 (14 December 2007)

major spoilers, so please only for film makers, critics & those who have seen it.
i wonder if this movie won't do so good for this reason... i was pretty disappointed in the zombies, how they moved, what they did, and how many are actually depicted on screen. in new york city, the zombie scenes show no more than 30ish zombies?
i'm a 'christiany' kind of guy so i appreciated the hopeful ending but wonder if critics will pander that. which is not the disappointing aspect. this is: there is this epic setting, NYC! and i was expecting some Return of the King kind of return. but nope.
the small gang of zombies moved like the cg monsters in Van Helsing. too fast, too cg, too spider mannish. so they weren't as biting or gritting as 28 days/weeks or zac's dawn of the dead.
they were rendered with too many layers of soft focus, glistening, vein layers, etc... so they looked more ultra real and lit etc then the hero. when one shows up and a huge awkward skip over was when the 'main' or 'leader' zombie set a trap for the hero. that seemed like a HUGE turning point in story, yet was glossed over.
its a good film. but again, no Return of the King pay off, in a Return of the King setting. so its not a great film.