didn't get it (right?)

Rating: Null/10 (25 March 2008)

Two questions (apart from many): 1) Why there was no explanation of the fact of the immune humans and half-immune doggy?! 2) If some zombies had an ability to maintain leadership and the others had choose to follow their lead, why there was no single zombie looking for a cure?!
Sub-question: Why there were no rival zombie gangs, while the one shown to us had an apparently defined structure as with any "political" animal gang, herd, flock or whatever it should be called? The meerkats have it, the chimps have it, then why zombies were so socially deprived in this case? GIVE ZOMBIE RIGHTS TO ZOMBIES!!
Questions that need no answers (there aren't any, isn't?): And how can you manage to live in the world of zombies if they are so smart, just by pouring some liquid on your doorsteps? Ah, c'mon, don't call me a nerd for this!! But if any smell could be leading you to the threshold of the same house for years and months, and disappear then... why you won't try to break in to check if there is something more tasty than anything you can catch on the street? Only if you not so hungry or an ex-vegan zombie. Sorry then, but you'll starve to second death...
Well, then there is another one: How on Earth (or in the any given galaxy) could all those animals Will was hunting on be uninfected and hoping around the buildings full of zombies whole day without any place to hide in when the dusk will fall?
ME AND MY WIFE, WE LOVE WILL SMITH. THE FACT OF HIS INVOLVEMENT IS THE ONLY GOOD THING ABOUT THE MOVIE. BECAUSE IF THERE WAS ANYONE ELSE IN HIS PLACE, THAT WOULD SPELL " A DISASTER". Entertainment without brains makes you a ZOMBIE. Beware!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! HHHA...