How could this be the best horror movie?*Possible Spoilers*

Rating: 4/10 (30 January 2006)

Not bad I will admit right up to par with Saw 2. Please, it takes you to the face of horror and does not back down? Every time it got good they would cut away or change scenes, this movie could have been good with a different director. Granted Roth is a good writer but not such a fine director. The last scene was the best and most horror filled, I actually think it looked like a different style of directing if you ask me, just because you throw fake blood and fake body parts around does not make it a horror film. This movie did not scare me, it was not the best of horror, it was barley better than the Devil's Rejects which really sucked. I gave this movie a chance and no it did not suck but it was not even worth the discount ticket price I paid, not very cinematic at all, I could have watched it on a six inch screen with the same effect. The ending when he remembers the girl drowning and runs to save the girl? I mean the story of his childhood memories never fit the movie at all, it was out of nowhere, they could have played that whole series of events and emotions out better, but that's just me.