Very unrealistic!

Rating: 1/10 (14 December 2001)

Harry Potter was indeed a disgrace to the books. There was so many things wrong in it.
First thing. Steven Speilberg's magic was missing. Chris Columbus made it very unrealistic. It is a reminder of Home Alone. The only difference is that Home Alone was better. Daniel Radcliffe is a very bad actor. He is too inexperienced for a role in such a big movie. Many better actors could have been chosen.
The special effects are very unrealistic. For a $90 million movie they should have been perfect. When Harry is flying away on the broom it was clearly obvious that he was in front of a blue screen. The list could go on and on. The best effects this year belong to Jurassic Park ///.
Bottom line: I don't know how anyone could think a movie could justify with the book. Impossible. I hope no more are made.