The book is the book; the film is the film.

Rating: 7/10 (24 December 2001)

J K Rowling is a marvelous story teller. I have enjoyed her writings, but to grasp the world of Harry Potter and his quest, repeated readings are recommended.
In the same way, the film must be seen more than once (you're welcome, Warner Bros.) to rank it fairly. I agree there were several parts of the book omitted or downplayed that should have been in the film.
The film makers should heed the outcry of the purist and try to include pertinent characters and circumstances in the future. Unfortunately they cannot print a revised edition, or can they?
I went to see it with friends and family. I don't think my youngest grandson got all of the nuances of the pictures, but Hagrid's entrance scared the heck out of him, but only for a few minutes. His brother loved it and he is five.
I rank the film below the book, but much higher than some of the art of cinema presently on your neighborhood screen.
Harry comes in with a 7 on his House Cup finals.