A pleasant paint-by-the-numbers-rendition of the book

Rating: 7/10 (16 November 2001)

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a fairly adequate piece of film making with some thrilling special effects; however, it lacks the storytelling ability of the novel. In fact, this film is proof that the depth of a novel disappears when one attempts to copy the story word-for-word, scene-for-scene. Most films adapted from novels utilize techniques geared toward "motion picture story-telling" which is quite different. I did thoroughly enjoy the special witchcraft effects. I especially liked the fast and furious Quiddich game with its heart-stopping scenes that could make the Kentucky Derby look more like a tiny tots merry-go-round.
The acting of the young, newcomer leads is adequate. The adults are wonderful in their roles. Maggie Smith deserves extra kudos for her exceptionally enchanting portrayal of Professor McGonagall. Bottom line: the film should amuse Harry's legion of readers, though be prepared to ask the question, "Why did I enjoy the book so much more?" Non-readers may have trouble at times with the storyline, but will probably feel satisfied that they know a little more about the wonder of Harry Potter.