Much better style than the others.

Rating: 7/10 (5 June 2004)

I just saw Harry Potter 3. Wow, a lot of changes, in a good way. First off, Daniel Radcliffe's acting is still as crappy as usual, but not as bad as Malfoy. The thing that amazed me the most was the very different style of cinematography, which is dark, grainy, and much better than Columbus's boring Directing. You can definitely see the change. Well, unfortunately this movie started off a little slow. I felt like there was a lot of missing material and was a bit to short (142 min), considering how big the book is. There was not as much action or comedy in this installment which left it a bit bland. Bottom line is: Slower than the other HPs, better Directing, still crap acting (Daniel Radcliffe). This may be worth seeing if your family takes you, otherwise not. Much better quality than the other HPs. 7/10