Harry Potter 3 Adaptation is a complete letdown

Rating: Null/10 (4 June 2004)

I must admit, I was pretty exited to see this film. I read the book at least twice, and wanted to see if the film makers could honour it.
Unfortunately, it sucked.
But why?, well here's a list:

The Dementor's fly (WHAT!!??) - Dumbledore looks like an Imposter - The Whole Set has changed, confusing the audience further. - Not enough Depth in the plot, the screenplay relies on the fact that you've read the book. - The Ending was rushed - The CGI leaves at LOT to be desired. - Harry Produces a STAG when performing the patronus charm, not a bright glow - It took months for Harry to master it, NOT in ONE Lesson after a few tries. - The Scene in the Shrieking Shack was too short, and was rushed.

Should I go on? Okay:

Apart from Sirius Black, Wormtale, Cornelius Fudge, and Mr Weasley,

All other actors/actresses sucked at their roles. Yes even Harry, Ron & Hermione.

It was a potentially dark film, but was catered for children, AGAIN!

Which meant, short scenes and simple explanations
I'm sure I don't need to continue. Believe me, I am deeply upset at the appalling way the film was made.
I so wanted it to rule, to be on the Jaw Droppingly Whet Levels of 'The Lord of the Rings Trilogy', but no such luck. The hype of the film was also COMPLETELY unjust.
I hold out NO HOPE for 'Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire' I guess, to really appreciate the story, you'll have to stick with the books.
I walk away, head down, hands in pockets, kicking a stone down the street, feeling sorry for those poor people still under the influence of the hype. I don't want to tell them that it was rubbish, but at the same time, I felt that I had to.
If any of the people involved in making this film are reading this, you should be ashamed of yourselves, you've completely spoiled everything. You got everything WRONG, shame on you.
It wasn't all rubbish though. The Night Bus bit was Cool.
Baboon