Alfonzo has directed the best Harry Potter film ever!

Rating: 8/10 (15 June 2004)

I honestly thought that this film was going to be a failure, but I was proven wrong. It is better than the first two films! Not necessarily a triumph over the others though. The prisoner of Azkaban was always my least favorite of the series. To me, the book was too dark. the movie was dark though too. I say the first two films are based upon the magic of Hogwarts while the third is about the true, present darkness of the wizard world. I will not say anymore, so I won't be considered a spoiler! the film is also different for many reasons and the same. here's a list of differences and similarities.
Same: Differences: 1.) cast members 1.) New Dumbledore 2.) Music theme 2.) New locations 3.) location 3.) More maturity/teenage like 4.) A child film 4.) Darker cinematography/story 5.) An unsolved mystery 5.) New teachers/clothing
The differences are more approving than the similarities. however, it has amazed how much the cast as AGED!! Snape has aged, Neville is thin, Harry, and his two friends. Also Malfoy has a RIDICULOUS haircut, and is more of a 'pussy'! (Watch the film, witness what happens to him.) I also noticed more things happened in the background, more moving pictures, creatures and entertainment. the actor who played Dumbledore did not do a bad job! He did well, but his beard looked RIDICULOUS! the music was more teenage like, the action was more intense, the humor, more hilarious, and the grounds of Hogwarts was a lot more explored, which i was most glad about!