Great book, bat movie

Rating: Null/10 (2 June 2004)

First off all I like the movie but i think it could be much better. Alfonso Cuarón Orozco should at least read the book 20 times. Just to get in the mood of the Harry potter world. Then he had to see at the previous movies, so that he knew how that it looked like, you just can't change the castle and the grounds, you got to work with the seem things.
What I think was the saddest thing he could do is the patronus of Harry instead of a dear it is a little white line white a big cloud of white smoke, in the book its a dear that took the demontors on his head and throw them away.
I hope that Chris Columbus can make it al better whit the Goblet of Fire next year, Alfonso Cuarón Orozco can learn something from him. Not that the first two movies's where perfect but at least they wear better than this one.
Alfonso Cuarón Orozco chanced the story so that it would fix in his wicked way of things. I thing he didn't even took the time to read the book preparedly.
And I could be longer than 147 min for telling the whole story. 180 min like lord of the rings for example, just so that we could get into the magic world of Harry Potter.
But the cast was great Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger) and Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) did it very well. Robbie Coltrane (Rubeus Hagrid) was greater than in the first two movies'. Alan Rickman (Professor Serveus Snape) did his thing as snape and i must say, nobody could do it better than him.
If you haven't read the book, you don't understand the movie. So a tip first read the book and then go and see the movie, just to get a idea of the world of harry potter, but don't get your hopes to high.