OK movie, but lacked "the magic"

Rating: 5/10 (11 July 2007)

As Warner is under contract with J. K. Rowling, they are forced to some degree to stay with the story line, so those who have not read the books have no real frame of reference, though it is interesting to read their reviews. I believe this would be a very difficult movie to enjoy without reading the books, as there is no other way to fill in the gaps. There was no other way to understand most of the motivations, as they are not explained. As I am a big fan of the books, the conclusions that I drew from the movie were that Warner's primary decision on what part of the story stayed and what was cut was based on costs. Much of the "magic" was cut, and way too much time was spent just getting to Hogwarts.
I, as many others, believe Gambon's portrayal of Dumbledore is way out of character, but am afraid we are stuck with him through the next movie. If he has been directed in this manner, my apologies to Lord Gambon. He has absolutely no warmth. Dumbledore represents the leader of the powers of good, and this misrepresentation of his character effectively removes any love for the character. Dumbledore's kindness, consideration, and gentle spirit are central to the theme of the Potter saga. The movie portrays him as just another talented wizard. There is nothing special or unique about him. Why would anyone be upset if this character would die? It's not critical in the 5th movie, but in the 6th, it is one of the most important, if not the most important theme element to the plot. Gambon's take on Dumbledore is very short sighted.
I did enjoy the movie, but highly recommend to the fans that have not read the books that they are "missing the magic", and they should set aside some time to read. If you like the movies, I guarantee you will love the books.