it could contain spoiler . i don't know?

Rating: 7/10 (16 July 2007)

I was disappointed that they skipped Quidditch. i wanted to see a bit of that . like when Ron was heaving trouble with it and stuff, Wesley is the King!
i really agree Teaker1228 on what he said. the movie was nothing when you have read the book. but the movie the fight and when voldemort showed up . and what happened to harry then . it was all so cool . but i gave it three because of the story and the book . if i had not read the books then the movie would have been great . like Teaker1228 said . The first Harry Potter book was just over 300 pages in length. The movie was roughly 152 minutes according to the DVD in front of me at this moment. The fifth book was 870 pages. and this is true to Overall, it was like they took the book, cut out all of the pages, added their own to the pile, and then pasted it all into an order that they saw fitting. You'll notice however, that the film did in fact get a 4 from me. You may ask why. That answer is simple. The soundtrack and special effects were amazing. Fight scenes were rather enjoyable, and the music was wonderful. Really, I think the people responsible for these things should have been the only one to receive any recognition. So if you've read and enjoyed the books, this movie really isn't for you. If you've read the books, enjoyed them, but are there for special effects, you may enjoy it. If you've never read the books and your knowledge is based purely on the movies, you'll probably find this one an enjoyable addition to the series. so it was alright