Dumbledore's portrayal may have been off, but everything else tasted like a licorice wand

Rating: 10/10 (2 January 2006)

I agree with the statement that Dumbledore was way off, but everything else in the movie complied with the book with the exception of leaving out a few characters, such a Dobby, Winky, and Percy Weasley. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire follows the plot line of the book much better than the other three movies, meaning the scenes weren't just slapped together. Even though the Dumbledore was portrayed rather poorly, the rest of the actors did wonderful jobs by keeping the personalities of the characters within reason. I personally enjoyed Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire more than Prinsoner of Azkaban, Chamber of Secrets and Sorcerer's Stone. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the best out of all four Harry Potter movies.