the goblet of fire: the worst Harry Potter I ever watched

Rating: 3/10 (26 December 2005)

I'm absolutely disappointed. The stuff they've published doesn't represent the book's meaning at all they just picked out a few exiting scenes of the book and left out the rest. Of course if everything would have been published the movie would last about five hours, but at last they could have put in the house elves and Hermione's organization. This movie is not dignified to be called Harry Potter. All the Harry Potter movies that were made by Chris Columbus are a thousand times better than this rubbish. I can just hope that the films that are still left to be made will be better. But you might ask yourself now why I have given it 3 points and not just one, but of course there are not only bad things in this movie, there are still some good facts about it:
the stadium at the Quiditch world cup looked quite like I imagined it while I read the books
Voldemort looked quite funny, but here I must also mention that the death eaters were absolutely terrible: How the hell got the film makers the idea of giving them Sido's masks!
The yule ball was also funny but perhaps a little bit short.
There were lots of jokes in there.
So all in all "the goblet of the fire" was the worst Harry Potter I have ever watched, but it is still an event to pass the time.