Alternative versions of 4?

Rating: Null/10 (7 September 2006)

This contains spoilers: I object to The Princess Hermione being scripted as a nag.
I have only read the five most recent pages of comments.
Magic. What I have read is for and against. Some see massive flaws in loved stories. To others these are brilliant and true to the feel of good stories as they know good to be.
To me, these are captivating films, but also captured works. I understand these stories and my perception to have been tied up by something akin to He Who Must Not Be Michael Gerber. That is the only explanation that I have for the flaws.
Disaster. How Dumbledore's ways feel tied up in HP 4, TGOF, not in TPOA, so as to have the music taken away, a Bumble-door prune. How Princess Hermione The Great is scripted as an old nag and Emma liking it so. How the scenes between the lake and the maze miss out on a build up of plot. How the final curtains talk makes me think that Vol-De-Morgue has already won. How I got scared of HP 5 before it appears. Has J K been imprisoned too?
I understand that the feminist revolution was effective for that sort of situation, women having been tied up for thousands of years. However I understand the solution to have been effective for effective women, men too, but criminalising for the weak or dented. Used to be I had qualms re witchcraft stories.
For me to openly and effectively say that I feel the need for some sort of SPEW, I am living dangerously. When faced with a fool there are many who start slithering. I am also at risk of big trouble from the cures.
Then I read the book. I like it that the films never wobble the same as the book. My first viewing of 4 after that was wow. That happened as I drafted this as well. Magic.
The books read as by someone with reasonable skills in knowing sensible and practical ways to live life, effective legs. For me the films are maybe by people who are more down to earth, living in worlds with different rules. I obviously guess things wrong a lot, I am from a different world, but that explains the differences to me.
The paperback I have has cover blurb that this is a darker story than the others. Advertising words now true for the film but I cannot accept them of the book. HP 4 sets a tone of why this is a path that Harry and co need to follow for the Vol-De-Mod situation to be properly appeased. It shines as the most optimistic of these four.
I would really like it if Columbus returned for HP 7. For 7 to be two or three or four films, a Beat-Oven finale. My hope partly comes from his treatment of The One Who Flows, Hermione Nose. Ron had his Scabbers, I show error correction symptoms by knowing that I would like the role of a trans lesbian Crookshanks for the Granger of HP 1 and 2, even 3. One of many Hippogryff dances, curse or blessing.
Crookshanks can mean many different things. Bent lower legs. Bent as a natural for Slytherin. Having been bent and trying to get by.
This leads to Dumbledore 4 and physical contact: A Vol-die view, an inept old woman, not an inept pet. I assume a New Ell statement. Dumbledore 3's physical contact with Ron was not Old Woman and Cuarón revelled in a potentially lethal approach to contact by Her with Malfoy. The New Ell petrifies Harry in his bath, transforms Dumb and Gran-her and creates a Who Done It. Who would notice?
Will there be alternative versions available from the cutting room floor?
New Ell is day to day reality. I notice hints of this triggering some sort of war; against Newell, against some of the actors. I like the concept of an alternate version as it could work to try to calm this. I am likely being unreal.
The HP series has had such as Cuarón and Doyle willing to take part. To me, SPEW is wondering what is needed to be supportive to making their works fly. Put like that a fan can feel powerless, but a fan can note what happens when these fly. If it is an impossible question then at least there is a fan question there. A need to be in tune with SPEW that points in the right direction, in an okay way. Hippogriff dances need not be fire gobs.
With Tinker Belle it was simply stated: I Do Believe In Fairies, I Do I Do. Would that Leavesden Castle was just full of wannabe fairies in need of a safe world for making their films in. But this is a world where many are happy to express a disbelief in the fairy worlds. Or only to express belief for the deserving.
My last posting, for Nearly No Christmas, had a problem re automatic error correction of spelling mistakes. I wrote p re-school and what came out on the IMDb comment page is Prue-school. I had hoped to put some non standard smelling into this wannabe SPEW. At least the automatics should recognise Hogwarts.
*
While I do not agree with these, they stood out for me:
Poor omnium-gatherum of bad directing-work, 27 August 2006
If you haven't seen this movie, this review will HELP you decide., 9 August 2006
Utterly fantastic!!, 16 July 2006
Pretty good, 11 July 2006
Very Good, 4 July 2006
A great story was killed...Wanted for murder:Mike Newell, 28 June 2006
Captivatingly visual, 9 June 2006