Worst Harry Potter movie out of the four (and possibly five)

Rating: 3/10 (16 April 2007)

I was lounging around my house this evening and suddenly, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is on Movie Channel so why not have a go and watch it? I am an avid reader of Harry Potter and I have my own portrayals of all the characters (and I'm sure that all of you do too).
Now I know I can't change the appearances of Harry, Ron, Hermione etc because they're growing up but what about Viktor Krum? In the book, he's described as a boy whose tall, toned and muscular but in the movie, hes short and stocky. Fleur Delacour... yes she was pretty but I'm sure they could've done better. Now, the biggest disappointment for me was Dumbledore. So cold, distant and rough. He isn't the Dumbledore that we all know and love.
Mike Norwell cut a lot of parts but this one really 'bugs' me (ha ha pun intended). The reporter, Rita Skeeter was not mentioned as an Anamagus which is partially relevant in the fifth film. I know that if you kept every single part of the movie, you would be in there for 4 hours but I don't think they cut out the right parts. I fell asleep watching it in the Theatres! The special effects could've been better from the dragons to the scenery to iunno, everything! This truly was interpretted by Mike Norwell as one of the darkest books.
I did get the after movie jitters when I finished it in the theatres but now that I watch it maybe the third or fourth time around (partially), I realize that this was the worst out of the four movies that are out. I hope Mike Norwell did not direct the fifth one.