Both, best and worst of the series

Rating: 6/10 (17 January 2006)

This time i was surprised with the result that WB gave me. And again, i say that i don't care how much was cut out of the original book. I am taking this as a film, not as an adaptation. Yes, this one definitely is darker and more adult, bet are they going to say that before every HP movie? Of course, but with time it will stop working, and HP will be making barely 300 000 000 dollars, because this film was already PG-13, which is pretty silly, because HP is already a kids classic, and now it is stolen by an attempt to attract more people to the theaters. I would call that a brutal attempt to make extra $$$. But, dammit, it works! Now, i will tell you why this film could disappointing for those, who also take this as a film - first of all, the acting. It's not really terrible, but it's not convincing. And how D. Radkliff got to one of the top spots of the IMDb "Best And Worst Polls of 2005" as best actor, is beyond my understanding. It is just impossible for 16 year old to play a 14 year old! YOU CANNOT FAKE PUBIRTY!!! Radkliff should have understood it. The same goes to the other actors. And now we come to the special effects. Same old, same old, one year CGI, which will seem really crappy after a few years or so. And again, this is just an entertainment movie, that definitely overrated and taken far too seriously.