1 good 2 very good 3 excellent 4 b*******

Rating: 1/10 (30 April 2006)

GOF, it's mediocre, i (after of this b*******) say ''all the pictures of Harry Potter are good''... but this to the twenty min. i give the critic reportage, when i coming to my home and my father ask me ''are good?'' i say ''what piece of s***'', the picture move so faster, why?. for the duration, need to be the same, for that, the f****** a******* (director and the adapter), leave in the screen one picture of s*** but sell out for that, i ask what a f*** Warner pay to the a*******, makers of this f*** picture?, why?, why the Warner don't pay to one director what don't be an a*******, here the ac tings are very bad, just the a******* like one of my f*** friends say ''whit mother (in Spanish want to say ''exelent'')'' like for what the special effects, here pay to much but noting, i hope what intelligent people critic this picture not for the effects, but also for the script, the director and the acts