Not accurate to the book

Rating: 4/10 (30 November 2005)

OK, I'm a big Harry Potter fan, and was entertained by the special effects, the music and the acting. They were all good BUT . . .
This movie is only understandable by those who have read the book. Read the comments written in this forum by Reed Armstrong. He is absolutely right. The antics with the Dursleys, OMG! how could they leave that out? I would like to add also, that, in the book, Neville did not give Harry the Gillyweed it was the house elf, and speaking of the elf, he was also at the Quiddich World Cup scared out of his mind. he wasn't in the movie either, I believe this was key to the story on the Deatheaters, also the attack of the Deatheaters in the movie ,GIVE ME A BREAK, they just walked around chanting, the book had more action. Also the maze scene, how cheesy was that? That was the scariest part of the story, not even the big spider was there, they left too much out of that. I believe this story should have been more like a two part deal like Quentin Taratino's "Kill Bill" series, or maybe even a week long TV miniseries, there is just way too much in Goblet of Fire that is important. I understand 'cause of movie length issues, they couldn't re-create the whole book. Maybe also, they could have extended the movie a little longer and added an intermission. I'm a big Bollywood movie fan, I go to see Bollywood at theaters all the time, Bollywood movies are extremely long that they have intermission, and the crowd doesn't seem to mind. Anyway, As I said.. the music, acting, and effects, along with visual imagery was awesome, it's the telling of the story that sucked. Out of the 6 books, Goblet of Fire is my favorite, that's why I take this criticism personal.