brilliant, but a little undeveloped

Rating: 9/10 (25 January 2006)

It was very good, it was brilliant, but it was a little undeveloped and a little rushed. Well, it is a very long book, so they had to pile a lot in. I understand. They did'nt want to make two films, but I would'nt have minded though. They could have done it, but they did'nt. Plus they did'nt let all new characters developed completely. So that's what I mean by "undeveloped" and "rushed".
But what I mean by "very good" and "brilliant" is that it really "was" a good film--you know it, too. I liked it because it was finally "The Goblet Of Fire". Finally this book was turned into a film, finally. The book was my favorite (okay, I did'nt read it, my brother told me "everything" about it when "he" read it). Yes, yes it was rushed and all but I really really liked it. So that what The Goblet Of Fire looks like as a film, hah. I wonder if J.K. Rowling would have liked it, well you don't know what you don't know. Even though the new characters of this film were'nt exactly developed, the actors and actresses did a very good job, every one of them.
So do I recommend this film for you? Yes, yes I do. Because if you see one "Harry Potter", you'll have to see them all. And plus this one is probably the most important of all of them so far. Yep, yes it is. So you ought to see it, people, even though it is a little "undeveloped" and "rushed". It is still a brilliant film.