It didn't deliver

Rating: 6/10 (21 July 2011)

‎"IT ALL ENDED" an I felt Nothing! Thanks to Mr Yates for making such an insipid and heartless series of movies. It was all about action to the next action, then a plot hole, then the next action, blah blah blah, plot hole, wait, was that a dead Weasley in the background? was him George? we won't know unless we read the book, hole, next action. The guy is Just a Technician, NOT a Storyteller!!!!! Yates assumed that everyone in the theatre read the book before they entered, which must be 80% true, but in adaptations from books to movies the movies must stand by themselves, and not to require to consult the book to understand what the "bloody hell" happened out of camera, forgetting the unexplained "holes", the movie, his movies from the 5th to this last one" become so mechanical in the way the story were told, and seemed so rushed", Yates forgot to bring up the emotions and feelings in the characters, I wanted to be emotionally touched by Dumbledore's death in the 6th but he died like a dog and i didn't see a bloody tear in any of the characters "no funeral for the headmaster?" even when we had a funeral for some x dude called Cedric in the 4th?'I was expecting George's death to be a big EMOTIONAL event in the movie, I am not bloody sure if he was George at all because they didn't mentioned his name. Yates focus importance in events, in taking the story from one point to the next, forgetting the emotional psychology that should be in the characters. Many are saying that the books are too big to be totally faithfully adapted to the big screen, BULLSHIT, Lord Of The Rings was bigger and it delivered! why, they had a director that knows how to tell the stories from a more human and intelligent point of view. others said that we expected too much from the movie, Come on, Its "HARRRY POTTER" it HAD to be BIG! not just in scale of "events". As any other movie conclusion one expects to be emotionally thrilled and moved.