good, but not that good...

Rating: 6/10 (11 February 2012)

i will say my review in 10 sentences. 1: what sup with the adaptation, i read the whole book, and it was not that "epic and good" as everywhere says, the film is uncompleted. 2: what sup with all the darkness and stuff? hey i know, it's the final chapter something that everywhere want to see, but seriously, Voldemort was not that "creepy" as the 5th or 6th movie, and Harry was not the "hero" of the film, Neville was. 3: the history was not that good, the only good thing about the film (in my opinion) was the part when Harry finds out about Severus' past. 4: it was too short, i was hoping that the film were use to be more long than 3 hours, not 2 hours. 5: what was the deal with the division? wait for so long to see this?. what a bullsh*** 6:the end was not that good as i was hoping, seriously, "19 years later" 5 minutes later... "The End". WTF? 7: Voldemort' death, was not neither that powerful as i was hoping, i was waiting a battle like harry and voldemort in the 4th movie, or like dumbledore vs Voldemort in "harry potter 5" 8:the special effects were good, and also the sound, but something with the scenario din't call my attention 9: too many deaths, and also of one of the best characters (one of the Weasly' brothers) 10:and too many comedy, no some good actions scenes. in conclusion: was one of the worst films of harry potter.