Too Corny for Even a 22 year old kid

Rating: 7/10 (29 March 2003)

Harry PotterÂ…..what can I say about this movie? Well let's start by pointing out that the movie had better graphics than the first movie. The acting was questionable for some of the kids (including Harry Potter) but not for the adults. I guess is because I'm from New York, I just don't buy the perfect image that HP is presenting; I guess that's why people call it fiction. The kid is too proper, to innocent to be raise with such bad parents, I just don't buy it, it seems like a lie. I have to admit that I read the book, and I found the book so much better than the movie but not in the sense that most people are criticizing it. The movie portraits the book as perfect as it could, I just think that HP was meant to be read instead of being see. Imagination is always different for most personal and by looking at the movie you are just exposing the point of view of a few people. This is what I consider a true children's movie, I don't think I should be making a big deal out of how HP's acting or lack off, since children don't care about that, but they did over act a little bit. I just found the film a little too corny for even a 22 year old kid.