Better than the original... They grew up after a year.

Rating: 8/10 (3 August 2009)

I had one problem with the first film, The Sorcerer's stone. The three main characters, Harry, Ron, and Hermione, were irritating.Why would they care about all of this stuff? The kids were only supposed to be eleven in the movie. Why would they care if Snape was a bad guy or that stuff about the Sorcerer's stone? You don't see any other eleven year old playing real life chess. You know why? Because the Potter films are fictional. The sequel to the original, The Chamber of Secrets, is a lot better. Here are the reason why it's better: It's creepier, it's darker, it's funnier, and... the three stars grew up. Daniel Radcliffe definitely did. So did Rupert Grint and Emma Watson and they weren't as irritating. They really don't grow up until The Prisoner of Azkaban. The Chamber of Secrets is actually a disturbing film. There are large spiders, a basilisk, and blood. I won't go into the plot outline for The Chamber of secrets, but I thought I would let you know. This is an improvement on the original film. Like every Potter film, they keep getting better and better. They continue to get darker and darker. Here is my entire theory on the Potter films. The Darker, the better. That's what makes this film better than The Sorcerer's stone.