100 times better than Philosophers Stone

Rating: 10/10 (15 November 2002)

this movie was definatly 100 times better than the first, but the 2nd book is also twice as good as the first book, so what do you expect! but aside from storyline, the actors have matured SO much, it's nuts, the first movie they look so young, you can tell they've aged very much since the beginning of filming of the sorcerers stone. they also have gotten much better at acting, and playing their respective roles, especially daniel radcliffe and tom felton. daniel(harry) fulfills his role of victor/defender/hero MUCH better in the 2nd film, he is truly a hero, and did an awesome job. and i just love tom felton, he has truly made draco the little devil he is, but i luv him neway! fans of all ages will surely enjoy this film, it is hilarious, GREAT comic relief, but also SCARY, i jumped a few times, and i'm 19 and i don't get scared easily( not saying this film scared me, but i was started and some things in it are just creepy! ) it's great, i say the target audience, which would enjoy and get the most out of this film is definatly those ages 13-25 who've read the books, and in addition adults of course! but as for the younger crowd, well i don't think they can appreciate the books, and the myths/legends/facts jk rowling draws everything from, or the symbolism/foreshadowing etc. not to mention this movie is definatly scarier than potter #1 THIS GETS A BIG 10 FROM ME. GO READ THE BOOKS THO!!!!!!