I've seen it this summer and I'm shocked by the reviews

Rating: 10/10 (15 October 2008)

One day this summer (I think it was a week after this movie's release), I went with a friend to see Hancock, and both of us were thrilled. The action scenes, the actors (Will Smith is excellent, by the way) and of course, the humor (the ''Asshole'' gag that returns often always seemed funnier than the previous time we had heard it. But, the day after I saw this movie, I went on the internet (mostly on www.metacritic.com) and saw that reviews for Hancock were mostly mixed, with an average of 40 or 41 out of 100. I read most of the reviews, and then I flash-backed towards the movie. And I had to agree that even though Hancock is very good, it wasn't a perfect movie and, against my will, agree with the other people's criticism on the following points: Lack of story-At first we are introduced to Hancock, not your average superhero, and he does some pretty good stuff, but then even though the story does follow, the whole love affair that Mary (Charlize Theron) has with Hancock doesn't fit in. And that's just one of the unnecessary items.
Shaky camera-God, I hate cameras in movies (Think Bourne Ultimatum) where the camera seems to shake all the time. In Hancock, the camera does shake a bit (it is less hyperactive than in Bourne 3) and it does distract the audience.
Villain- Who is the villain? There seems to be none except for maybe the Korean men at the beginning, and those crooks who don't have really anything to do with the story. Or Mary and her superpowers. Who is the villain?
And that's just a few flaws. My point is correct the flaws and Hancock is a classic. For now, it's a really good movie.