It was good, but the ending was a bit weak.

Rating: 6/10 (8 July 2008)

**Warning-May contain spoilers** Don't get me wrong, I liked this movie. The beginning especially was good, with a lot of comedy and action that made me think I'd made a good choice in going to see it. However, it started getting a little weak toward the middle and, in my humble opinion, the ending was a little on the weak side. Also, the movie was pretty predictable. I had most of the plot-twists figured out before they were ever even vaguely mentioned by the characters. Then at the end of the movie, everything sort of fell apart in my eyes. Everything turned out alright for everyone except for the bad guys. In my opinion, there need to be more movies like the Saw series that defy the Hollywood cliché of happily ever after. Don't get me wrong, I love it when the good guys win. But sometimes, their triumph is far too convenient to be believable, even in the context of the movie. I like when there are twists where things still turn out all right, but maybe the hero lost his/her dog to the villain. So, in the end, Hancock was a good movie that could have been a lot better if they had somehow defied that age-old cliché of the good guys ending up with everything better than it was.