A prime example of where a film concentrates entirely on the graphical accuracy.

Rating: 3/10 (17 March 2015)

A prime example of where a film concentrates entirely on the graphical accuracy. Now, I'm sure most of you have seen other critiques praise the director for "the best space film to exist", but this is just far from that. They're just overrated claims. I recommend you watch this film for not its aesthetics, but to discover the same viewership opinion as myself. I honestly wanted to love this movie, but the script and dialogue is just overtly lacking. I must say, I do love the graphics. They're probably the best for an outerspace film. However, I watch films solely on the basis of the storyline and narrative acclaim. You'll find a vast majority of irrational and unexercised users suggest that this film is easily the best space related film, but to totally disregard 2001: A Space Odyssey and Apollo 13. If you want to experience a real space narrative, watch those films and hide from this overdramatised film. But if you do wish to consume this over-hyped blockbuster where an astronaut cyclically floats from one exaggerated disaster to the next whilst consistently shrieking, by all means go for it.