terrible. how in the world did this get a rating of 8.2??

Rating: 3/10 (25 July 2015)

i've said it all in the title. how does an absolute piece of junk like this get an 8.2 rating when something utterly brilliant like Inherent Vice gets a rating of only 6.9? holes in the plot are like chasm's. the acting is forced and totally unbelievable. i thought that Tyler Perry seemed to be the only one who seemed to realise how bad this movie was whilst doing his best to fullfil his contract. bet he regretted signing on for this one. it seems that the high rating is largely due to positive critical review. just goes to confirm what i have pretty much always thought about movie critics. they're a large factor in the decline of modern cinema. decided to watch this purely because of the IMDb rating. i thought at 8.2, "well it can't be that bad." you guys need to remedy that and quick smart, before other discerning movie-lovers are sucked into losing 2 hours of their life like i was. came here expecting to see a raft of positivity from movie fans, but i must say i was pleasantly surprised most people seemed to have a similar opinion of it as me. that was indeed the only thing that was refreshing about this movie experience. otherwise...just painful. wtf?