"Godzilla"? More like "Blank"

Rating: 2/10 (2 August 2015)

While the movie's effects are pretty good, the plot has more wholes than I can count, tries to explain unrealistic events with silly concepts, and lives up to every single disafter movie cliché in movie history. The characters are forgettable and not interesting at all, the choices they make makes no sense, and there's way too much focus on humans. The star of the movie should of course be Godzilla, but after one and an half hours through the movie, I've seen literally just 5 mins, AT MOST, of him. It took an hour before we were even shown Godzilla (Besides a few short clips of his backspikes, while he swims in water, yay?). This is for me the biggest mistake a monster movie can make EVER! Godzilla (1998) was stupid, badly scripted and horribly acted, sure, but AT LEAST it had way more Godzilla in it.
After one and half hours, I had to stop the movie. I couldn't stand anymore exposition of bland and clichéd characters. I feel like a fool for having even seen this much. It's so pointless. What's the point of this movie? I came to see Godzilla mess **** up. I got nothing of that sort. NOTHING. So disappointing.
The shouldn't have named this "Godzilla". They should have named it "blank", because there's no f***ing Godzilla in it! 2/10