If the roles were reversed..

Rating: 2/10 (30 May 2017)

Short review. If the races were switched as to whom was the predator and whom was the prey, there would be national outrage and this would be a boycotted and hidden film. There are limits, in my personal opinion, when you become too psychological, too propagandizing, in narratives that are inappropriate for society. With an age that is strongly pushing an anti-cop, racist, and white-privilege tone I could not get past the obvious intentions to shape, or at least strongly influence, public thought towards problems that back-room backers seem to spare no opportunity to not be involved in to achieve societal perceptions. I get tired of the double standards that exist where for some, it is OK to unfairly demonize a race depending on which race it is. I largely reject the anticipated arguments of lavish praise for efforts based on history that simply is not the present, or simple artistic expression. When America is a place where all methods of "artistic expression", or religious expression for that matter, are equally protected and not shut up based on threat of violence, advertiser boycotts, or "hate speech", perhaps I might change my views. This movie, to me, was as clear of an attempt to hide anti-white propaganda under a guise and found the film to be disgusting and racist. Racism towards white people is not "reverse racism" (the term alone being another evidence of how skewed society has become) or somehow different than any racism towards any race. This is racist. Plenty of films have been banned, boycotted, and protested for doing much less than the rampant anti-white themes throughout this film.. and yet, due to prevailing voices, racism is indeed alive and well as the film broadly wishes to convince viewers of.. only not in the way intended by the production team.