Waste of time

Rating: 2/10 (1 January 2003)

The movie itself was good enough for its genre (cinematically), but come on..... Did Scorcese really need that much time to tell a story *that* thin?!? Two gangs. One leader kills other leader. 15 years later. Son of dead leader takes revenge. That's really it!
Or perhaps I just didn't *get* it. But hey, I *did* like Titanic. ;)