A two hour ride into the battle

Rating: 7/10 (3 November 2014)

What to expect from 'Fury'? A good and a bad experience both at once. One thing is sure that whatever the filmmakers tried to achieve in Fury, they certainly did and so this is an above average movie. Good things first. The direction is good. I didn't expect this good direction from David Ayer, he has surprised everyone I believe. Acting is really good here too. The brand new mustache has done wonders for Shia LaBeouf. Brad Pitt has done very well as usual, expect another adventure of Aldo Raine of Inglourious Basterds one more time from him. But the surprise package is Logan Lerman. In my view, Logan is the lead actor in the movie. The movie gives a real feeling of a battle in The Great War of 1945. Fury is descriptive, sentimental, intense and exciting, no doubts at all.
Talk about negative aspects, there are a lot. My basic question is why you need a drama based on the biggest event in human history- WW2??? Why why?? Just because Inglourious Basterds was a successful movie?? The story is about nothing but the courageous battle showed at the end of the movie that too is a stupid one. One has to ask whether the Nazis were so dumb as far as the strategy is concerned?? A two hours run into the battle is excellent but from a point of view of a critique, you got to feel a passiveness in the movie. You can expect a real feeling of a great war but let all the logics rest at home. For me, the positives outweigh the negatives, but not by much. A good one time watch but not good enough for another watch. You can watch it once or you can watch Inglourious Basterds once more or just wait for a few days for 'Interstellar'. I give it a 7/10 for the real experience of a battle.