How to ruin a war movie within the final 20 minutes.

Rating: 5/10 (10 January 2017)

Fury actually begins quite good. It isn't uncommon for war movies to reduce "realism". So it is rather the standard that enemy forces attack just in the right size, so that the heroes can take care of them. And it can even be helpful for the audience, to focus on specific aspects.
Plus: We wouldn't want enemy PAKs and Panzerfäuste to attack organized, all at once from different sides, wouldn't we?
I might even accept the shallow characters, trying to represent the result of their harsh experiences. I could even accept the fictional scenario that a Tiger would engage a battle all on its own, so that "Fury" could prove its point of Americans fighting a technically superior opponent.
But the final battle ... I don't know, I think that's how you insult the intelligence of your customers.