A Brad Pitt film, not a WW2 film.

Rating: 5/10 (15 March 2020)

WW2 films are expensive and difficult to make. The biggest obstacle to making a WW2 film is how to source original or replica WW2 equipment. Tanks, in particular, can only be rented from the military body they belong to, so in the making of Fury the US Army would have leased out its tanks for filming - but not without censorship - if the Army does not like the script, they will not approve the lease of the equipment. So producers have restrictions on the stories they will be able to tell.
In the case of Fury, although we can marvel at the original Sherman Tanks and uniforms, the script is weak and at times cringeworthy, but worst of all there is a noticable difference in the range of the actors used, with some inhabiting their characters and others who are simply incapable, the introduction of one such character who is poorly cast, ruins the immersion of the film quickly after a stellar action sequence.
It also appears that there was no military advisor on set, with many extras shooting bolt-action rifles from the hip.
The final scene is comically bad.