More budgets, more actions and the existence of illogical scene

Rating: 9/10 (19 November 2015)

I'm not a fan of this fast & furious franchise, but it grabbed my look of those movies such as F&F 2011, 2013 and Tokyo Drift(2006). To watch it as racing movies, I think Tokyo Drift had proved it unlike those other seasons ( I haven't watched 1,2 & 4 seasons). But, as a fan of action movies, with the bombastic promotion as usual (same like Marvel's) , I asked myself to forget 100% about racing and just focus on the action and story itself, and take a look at the sports car that just being an eye-catchy of the film than the sexy women ( those cars are really delicious).
The story is the sequel of Tokyo Drift(if not mistaken). It's nothing great or heavy about the plot(fit with an action), it just about Deckard Shaw that want to get revenge of his brother Owen Shaw from Dominic's team due to Fast 6. But what I like is, the story is not going to straight seems like Deckard is chasing Dominic, Dominic is chasing Deckard until the end of the story. It makes this movie has the other little story to show rather than about revenge but it still sticks to the plot where Dominic's team need to save '' , a hacker(seems like that). With surviving this hacker, their job to find Deckard will became easier. The actions that James Wan(director) delivered to us are pretty well fit with the scene to scene. Yes, the actions well showed in full blast with the 250 million USD. The cars jump scene was really making me amazed, I didn't expect about this scene , it's a fresh idea. Regarding to Wikipedia, that scene didn't use CGI at all, it was trained many times, many cars to make this great scene. It didn't make sense at all why this film took 250M USD. But, there is a few scenes that challenged my logic thinking like a scenes "cars don't fly" and "escaping from terrorist at a hill" etc. It made me a little bit annoying when the action is everything to make the characters keep alive.
For me, the special effect is pretty good but I still can see the weakness at scene "Brian O'Conner's house exploded". I don't know about how the others think but I just feel that way. Off course, the CGI was nice for me after all, it's a Hollywood movie guys! About the cinematography, it's well played and the actions captured very well, I felt great for watching it. It's a pop corn flicks, I enjoyed.