Worst movie ever made? Well, not quite.

Rating: Null/10 (23 December 2003)

SPOILER There are worse movies available out there, but not many. This one at least does have nice use of colour, and Salma Hayek looks nice, but I can't think of many other redeeming points. The action/thriller is boring, and incredibly predictable, the morality is non-existent, the characters are ludicrous and the acting tends to be over the top and cheesy at best. Then it tries to be a vampire movie, with all the success of the worst of that genre, and none of the class of the best. If you didn't know it was a vampire movie, I suppose the twist might have been surprising, but it quickly turns to a step beyond the most moronic of such movies, even worse then Buffy the Vampire Slayer (which I like despite its weaknesses). I watched this movie because so many are raving about the great Quentin Tarantino, but it this is an example of his work, I will go back and watch old Ed Wood movies in preference. Oh, it also claims to be a comedy. How? Comedies are supposed to make you laugh, even horror/comedies, but this thing was so ploddingly boring that nothing humorous ever emerged. And Seth Gecko actually is a ******* b****rd for abandoning that girl at the end.