It's two different stories and two different movies

Rating: Null/10 (8 January 2005)

You have to understand that this movie is a combination of two totally different stories and they are very different in quality.
First story is about the brothers (Clooney and Tarantino) and their crimes. They take a family hostage and head for Mexico. This part is nice&good, I was interested to see more, but the plot suddenly turned to some cheesy&corny vampire story. This second story has no style and is totally awful. But Clooney does his best to save this part and I must say thank you to him, because otherwise there would be totally no purpose to watch this movie till the end (even Selma's striping is not sexy... She was doing that much better in Dogma).
So, the summary: first part was good and I would be glad to find out the ending of it without stupid vampires (I give 7 out of 10) and the second part about the vampires is awful (I give 2 out of 10, not 1 because of Clooney acting).
My advise: turn of TV when it comes to the bar in Mexico.