The reason IMDb needs to introduce the zero rating

Rating: 1/10 (30 April 2005)

Not being Tom Hanks' greatest fan, I avoided watching this film for several months after its release. This also gave me time for the hype to die down a little - but on the back of all the press and several positive comments I was still expecting to sit down to enjoy a good movie.
I was mistaken. My reward? Two hours of praying for the credits to roll to take away the pain.
To me this movie takes pleasure in displaying everything that is wrong with the Hollywood film industry - America's need to rewrite history to suit its own needs, its desire to peddle the "American dream" myth and the rewards given blindly to any movie that does the above (in the form of several Oscars - could anyone please explain to me the exceptional qualities of the movie that put it above anything else released that year?
If only Forrest had kept running... into the sea