Why I think this movie is horrible in terms of creativity

Rating: 4/10 (19 September 2006)

Notice I didn't say, "Why this movie sucks." I am merely stating my opinion, people. And for those of you who say the Finding Nemo message boards are for people who LIKE the movie--you are wrong. The message boards are supposed to be ABOUT the movie, and that's all. The following message DOES belong in this message board, even though it is a negative message.
Why I don't like this movie (and many other CGI's):
1) Pixar: "Well we've done a movie about this, we've done a movie about that, now all we need is a movie about fish! But it won't be hard, we'll just take the themes from our other movies and put it underwater."
2) Pixar movies all have the same unoriginal puns in them, and those puns are the only reason the movies are considered funny. A fish in a Pixar movie would say, "Give me high fin!" instead of "high five." It's really unoriginal and as un-clever as "un-clever" can be. A place in a Pixar movie will say, "Give me high wing!" A Bug's Life had another awfully uncreative pun: "Shoo, fly, don't bother me." And the funny part? He said it to a fly! HAHAHAHAHAHA, get it?! Jeez, Pixar is ridiculous. Toy story and Ice Age are really the only clever ones out there that don't rely on puns for humor. Superhero Pixar movie: "Eat your vegetables so you get stronger." HAHAHAHAHAHA! He's ALREADY strong! HAHA!
3) Dory: more annoying than Chris Rock's voice, more annoying than Chris Tucker screaming at Ice Cube. More annoying than the fact that almost all of the children's movies out there today are CGI.
4) Even in the movies where the characters are HUMANS, they STILL are trying to replace regular animation. CGI art is easier than pencil; computers automate a lot of the movements of things. The artist sets a track for the fish fins to follow, for the tail to follow, for the body to follow, hits okay, and boom, you got a fish swimming.
5) And again, for emphasis: same jokes as every other Pixar movie out there.