Entertaining to sucks.

Rating: Null/10 (1 April 2001)

I have to say this. I am a big time movie critic. When I say big, I don't mean famous. I just know what's good, especially in "Horror Films". This one was some piece of work in itself. The casting was good,... the story was original... some and I only mean SOME of the acting and lines were good. One thing though, I'm a big Tony Todd fan but what the hell was the significance of his character? What the hell? Then you've got the lover girl (Clear... what kind of name is that anyway?) who knows everything yet doubts? For the most part, this movie was good. On up until the end! I was more than insulted! I was !!!!OUTRAGED!!!! Did the makers of this movie think that the audience was too brain dead to notice the really screwed up quality in that ending. Give me a break!!! They insulted our intelligence! (I may not be showing to well with the spelling, but I'm only human.) I say one thumb up for the good the movie was doing and a middle finger straight in the air for what the makers resorted to in the end. Get a life wont they! It's like watching scream and other New Era Wes Craven films... nothing good in em... nothing like his old stuff.
Critic special by: Mr. Katmandu