The most creative part about it was the deaths... and that's not saying much...

Rating: 1/10 (2 February 2003)

The only words I could say after the credits started to roll was, "What the f***?!" This movie was an insult to the first and also to the whole horror genre. It felt like it was bordering on making fun of itself at many points, which would've saved the film a bit, but it didn't take the extra step to cross into that territory. The dialogue is completely laughable, and when it is good, isn't held in the spotlight as it should be. The spotlight of this movie, instead, is its gruesome gore, which at most times was portrayed in such a way as to almost make you chuckle at its lunacy.
The actors who portray these poorly developed characters are faces you will forget as soon as you leave the theater. They are so bland and fit into such generalities that every actor will remind you of a friend or neighbor. The only saving grace is Ali Larter, who should be embarrassed to be a part of this wretched piece of trash. Bottom line; if you've seen the first, you've seen the second with added class and maturity.