I probably missed the point but I found this generally lazy and quite offensive

Rating: Null/10 (5 March 2003)

One year on from the events that followed the destruction of Flight 180, Kimberly Corman and her friends are on a trip. On the road Kimberley has a vision of a horrific pile up and stops her car, blocking the access road. When the accident occurs Kimberley survives and has saved many other drivers. However when the survivors start to die in mysterious circumstances, Kimberley contacts Clear Rivers who survived the 180 flight and finds that death is coming after each of them in turn.
I saw this with family and had no voice in the choice. I only semi-enjoyed the first film and couldn't see this being any better. The start of the film (i.e. the crash) is powerful and pretty well done - it is horrific, scary and very unsettling. However after this the film settles back into the rut it was in the second half of last time. In place of genuine scares the film goes for gore by killing each person in increasingly unlikely and gory ways. If this is your thing then you'll enjoy it, however I wanted more than just effects and gore. There is no tension and no scares - as a horror it works in terms of gore but nothing else.
The characters are simply meat and nothing more - the film could have been 15 minutes long by cutting out all the pointless plot and just having the death scenes together. I felt no interest in any of these people and the majority of them were just given enough presence to make an impact when they were killed. I find this type of laziness really annoying - the makers just wanted the cinematic equivalent of a slaughter house, no substance or meaning, just a production line of body parts. I usually write a little about the actors and their performances when i do reviews but here it would be a waste of my time as no-one actually gave a performance worth talking about. They stuck in my mind only because of how they died. Only the Candyman added interest in a minor role.
Even as a horror movie this is a messy failure. It has one good scene that is terrifying but after that nothing - just one more protracted list of red herrings leading to the eventual gory death scene. I found it offensive that someone felt I would want to spend 90 minutes watching people be cut up and killed in gory ways without having anything else to offer. No characters, no plot (other than a rehash of the last film), nothing new, no spark, no flair, no good performances, few real scares and basically a real lazy and unnecessary sequel. Like I said - I found this gory film to be offensive, dull and quite unpleasant to watch. Avoid it or you'll only be encouraging the producers to come back for a third one - and no one wants that.