Not as good as the first but worth watching.

Rating: 6/10 (31 January 2003)

I am a huge fan of the first Final Destination film. I would give it a rating of a 9/10. Needless to say I was looking forward to the sequel. So after talking about it for months with my friends, today was opening day and I went to see it. When it started out, I was like oh man this is going to suck because we had drug jokes, a flashing biker chick, and lots of bad acting by everyone in the movie except the main character Kimberly. Then two minutes later the movie got exciting with the best scene in the movie and from that scene on I was hooked. I watched it and enjoyed it. I was very entertained but the only thing that really bothered me was the acting. Ali Larter was still good as Clear Rivers, A. J. Cook did a decent job in the role as Kimberly and Michael Landes as Officer Thomas Burke did a very good job, but everyone else should go back to acting class because their acting was incredibly poor.
Now what I did like about the movie was the deaths. They were just as good as the deaths in the first film. The deaths were a bit bloodier this time around and for some reason caused some laughs which really confused me. I think the bloodier deaths were supposed to make up for the bad acting =). The Deaths were cool, the plot was interesting, the acting from the 3 main characters was decent, but the acting from everyone else was horrible. So if you liked final destination 1 then see the sequel, it won't disappoint on following the same plot and pace as the first one, as long as you can get over the bad acting from the supporting cast you will enjoy yourself. My rating for Final Destination 2 would be a 7/10.