Why Am I Giving It A Ten

Rating: 10/10 (20 March 2017)

I watched Fifty Shades Grey yesterday March 19 2017 from my European Union Croatian HBO Telekom Provider at my Asus S 200 E Notebook with Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit installment. God knows I tried not comparing 50 Shades Grey which is a second part of the novel thrillogy and a first part of a cinematic thrillogy to an original 9 1/2 Weeks but it is just impossible not to. I read every novel from a thrillogy and the first I read was a novel Fifty Shades Freed 23rd September 2013 as a to be continued first (...) part of a novel thrillogy which would be a third part of a cinematic thrillogy scheduled for a premiere February 2018. I am not going to be reviewing pros and cons but an overall cinematic impression. From my respectful perspective, I would not utilise any part of this cinematic artistry for a sales and marketing campaign. That written, Grey's cinematic fashion is awful. It is as if director utilised a fashion designer retro creativity to remind viewers of a fashion from a 9 1/2 Weeks cinematic artistry which would be ridiculed with a denim street fashion. Secondly, Christian Grey is not handsome enough for a suit nor for a denim. I would rather visualise Grey in a some kind of an uniform. In such a manner, it would become rather interesting for a director to destrict his uniform appearance to submissive because, in a matter of a Fifty Shades Thrillogy, Christian Grey is a submissive even though cinematic story evolves around submissive philosophical tutorials given to Anastasia Steel. In my not so humble opinion, this would be a difference between 9 1/2 Weeks and a Fifty Shades Thrillogy which an author El James, due her a wee-bit infantile approach, did not successfully disclosed to a reader nor to a viewer. Nevertheless, I am giving it a ten for this childish approach even though I would never invest my rationalised financials into this cinematographic piece.