Well the movie is not as bad as the awful book it is based on

Rating: 4/10 (14 February 2015)

Well, I must say, as far as this movie is concerned although it's based on a poorly written book, it is still much better than the crap of a book.
Based on the acting, the main cast could have done much better than they did. Expected a lot from Jamie Dornan. There are so many actors out there that would have done a much better job than he did. Johnson actually fit perfectly the description that conforms with Ms Steele in the book. Although her acting was here and there she actually in my opinion helped the movie a little. But they both really need to work on their chemistry and not make it look like they are forced to do things and they should try and make their acting believable.
But then with the acting and the putting together of all the cast and crews it falls short of my expectation of the movie. Really expected so much from the movie even if the book was shitty i must say.
The other remaining cast well didn't do much to help the movie just made the movie more and more unbearable to watch but still in my opinion it's better to watch the movie than read the appalling book written by a horrible writer.
But i have a strong positive in this movie and that goes to the soundtracks of the movie. They did do a good job in the use of and putting together of soundtracks for the movie and the use of them at appropriate timing. This is really why i think the movie deserves a 4.
A better work can still be done for the remaining sequel if there would be one. But the actors should work on their skills and their acting and again the movie doesn't have to be entirely based on the terrible book.