Not very interesting

Rating: 5/10 (23 March 2015)

This wasn't a movie that I would be interested but, as my wife had read all the books and wanted to see the movie I decided to go along and watch the movie with her.
One way or the other I wanted to see if all the media hype around this movie was justified or not. The lead actors weren't known or interesting to me, so I wasn't expecting some off the wall interpretations.
The story plays around a young woman that replaces her friend in an interview of a young wealthy business man, and is attracted by his charm and wits, as he is to her.
The next almost two hours of movie we can see their relationship growing, into his kinky sexual preferences that she sometimes doesn't understand, trying to make him love her the "normal way", without physical pain. Which she only endures because he is rich, otherwise this would be called sexual harassment.
This said, the story is kind of flat, monotonous, and doesn't prove or show all the explicit sex the media is trying to sell to us. People that I talked to that read the books said that the movie doesn't show 1/10 of the sexuality of the original story – rating oblige??!!. The interpretations seam competent com a slight relevance to Dakota Johnson over Jamie Dornan. For someone that didn't read the books, it seemed like a competent movie but not very interesting and It was made clearly to make dividends on the popularity of the books.