Paid off reviewers?

Rating: 1/10 (20 June 2007)

It amazes me how many 10's I am seeing.
This movie deserves a 4 overall, but I'm evening out the ridiculously biased reviewers who post the following types of comments "but I find when a good film gets bad reviews, that means most people just didn't get it. " No, the problem is, THEY DID GET IT. What the? "Oh this film got bad reviews because people didn't get it" I don't believe I actually read that comment.
Here's the thing with the movie. These were major points which is why the movie got bad reviews by almost everyone not paid off or under the age of 10.
1) Plot So Victor Van Doom all of the sudden decides to attack the Fantastic Four. Um.... why did he? He just said "I'm not about to let you stand in my way". Stand in the way of what? There was no plot at all as to how he'd thought they'd be a problem to his plan... the plan he never vocalized in any way shape or form.
2) Heroes for causing accidents they started? What? They caused the entire bridge accident scene. Then they were looked to as heroes for.... um...... damage control to their own actions? This movie is one of the biggest worst big budget films I've ever seen. My problem is the script, it's crap, along with the director A little investment in a decent writer would have done wonders for this film.
Most of these actors have a lot of talent and have appeared elsewhere. I don't blame them. I blame the director and writer that utterly failed to have any type of plot.
"but I find when a good film gets bad reviews, that means most people just didn't get it. " No, we got it, and unless you can justify why a plot less film deserves a good review, I'll consider you a paid off reviewer.