Good for television, bad for movie

Rating: 4/10 (16 October 2017)

Its mediocre TV entertainment at best. I cannot just believe that David Yates did both last Harry Potter movies and this movie. Seems like totally different directors. Harry potter 5,6,7a,7b are all totally amazing and this is crap. Guess Steven Kloves (screenplaywriter of HP 5-7b) was important.
In this movie, the idea with a wizard zookeeper is kinda interesting, but gets really boring fast actually. And the plot continues in its horrific fashion. Also the agents repair the whole city in a flash. No, just no, the repairing magic is serious magic not performable by most wizards, sure in Harry Potter 6 we saw Albus Dumbledore (best wizard who ever lived) do this kind of magic in one apartment, and it was way slower than when these "agents" repaired the whole city.
Gellert Grindelwald was only seen in a short glimpse, and it was strange and awkward, the battle ended in 10 seconds, nothing interesting, zero novelty in that battle.
OK so in all it was a very bad movie like 1 or 2, but there are of course some positives with it, since i gave it a 4. The main character, the zookeeper is actually an interesting awkward personality. And the scenery of this movie was very very good. I love the art deco environment its trust worthy, just because of this i gave this movie 3 points extra.