Not as immersive as the Harry Potter films

Rating: 7/10 (18 November 2016)

The beasts truly are fantastic in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Did J.K. Rowling outdo herself as the writer? Yes and no. She does introduce several new exciting elements of the famed wizarding world, and yet the plot in this particular film is quite disappointing. The trailer and the very title of the film are misleading - but, if one goes with an open mind and does not expect beasts let loose all over, beasts found and beasts to the rescue, one may rather enjoy the film. Of course there's "some" beasts let loose, beasts found and beasts to the rescue in the film, however, the larger part of the film entails something more ominous. Moreover, this film has merely set the scene for what seem to be more interesting sequels.
Plot - 6/10
Ever since David Yates took over the Harry Potter series, it has become darker in comparison to Chris Columbus' first two parts. Well, in his defence, the kids grew up to face more dangerous enemies, setting a dark tone for the story itself. Anywho... In Fantastic Beasts (and...), the events happen too fast as everybody is trying to save New York city, and hence does not make an immersive experience unlike the other Harry Potter films. In fact, this one is better than none of the Harry Potter films. Yet, Yates has done a fantastic job in directing this film and I look forward to watching the next four parts(!) in the series.
Direction - 8/10
Eddie Redmayne is brilliant as Newt Scamander, and you can't help but fall in love with Newt - he's eccentric in an adorable way. The rest of the cast are great too, and the cameo appearance of one "big star" makes for a really good scene.
Cast - 9/10 Acting - 8/10 Cinematography - 10/10