incoherent even by Kubrick standards (spoilers)

Rating: Null/10 (13 August 2000)

After seeing 2001, Clockwork Orange, Full Metal Jacket, and The Shining, I had to see this. The previews and hype a year ago made this seem like a porn film to suck in viewers. Even after you've rented the film, the film still tries to decieve you by putting the nudity scenes in the beginning. Halfway through the film, thoughts and questions quickly come up:
"Wow, there's not much nudity after the beginning, and the beginning is where all the footage for the previews came from. That was no accident."
"What did the I-love-you-house-call scene have to do with anything?"
"There's not much sense of direction here."
"Am I missing something?"
"What's going on here? Will someone please tell me?"
And then, after the film is over, more questions:
"What was the costume ballet thing all about? Who were they? Was that all a set up for Harford?"
"So a hooker Harford never had sex with was diagnosed with HIV. So what? It's a hooker!"
"About a third of those scenes should've ended up on the cutting room floor. A lot of scenes pop up that have no signifigance later in the movie."
I'm sure you'll find many more questions about the movie that will never be answered. Maybe Kubrick knew he was going to die and just wanted to make a confusing movie with unanswered questions just to drive us crazy.