PG rating should have been R

Rating: 8/10 (17 May 2015)

The PG rating should have been R because the content of the movie was disturbing. The content of a robot going into society after killing off the lead players is a disturbing and menacing idea which I think should be banned. The notion of a robot out thinking a human of high intelligence is scary and the idea is plausible at the same time. The two main characters of the movie had major flaws, which made each person a real human being in the romantic sense of the word. One had a sexual addiction and the other an addiction to alcohol. Both were smart with blindspots. It is at least conceiveable that a AI robot could outsmart humans. And perhaps they already are. If the film-makers can film it, and think of it, then some scientists in the world are probably already leading into this kind of technology. It is very terrifying because the robot makes little or zero mistakes and the human sometimes does, like a pilot of an aircraft. If there were robots who could fly an aircraft flawlessly always - then this could benefit our world, but on the other hand, an aircraft needs to be manned by humans because of all the decisions that need to be made in times of emergency. Could robots be the new future pilots? Are not aircraft almost all automated already? If human error in flying was eliminated would we have more safety? Or is the notion of a decision making robot entering the realm of untrue - because of inferiority of robots to humans? Does this movie break the stereotype and show that robots are superior to humans? Could this be a true statement?