Trashy mess, god bad, awful flick, poorly paced - lame excuse of a movie that breaks all the rules

Rating: 1/10 (20 September 2019)

I watch this film last night and i still don't like it. I hate it in 2016 and since than I have not seen this film until yesterday and i still don't like it. I am going to get a lot of hate for not likeing this film and a lot of votes down for my review. I am alone on this and I think this movie is god awful, terrible flick. It is not a good movie at all, it is not a scary original concept. It wasn't scary or creative enough, this film broke a lot of rules. Some people think this movie is better than the original "The Evil Dead" that movie is old school classic horror film this movie is trashy mess. I will explain why I still don't like it:
The movie is boring, the pacing is god awful slow. This film broke a lot of rules from the original The Evil Dead (1981) movie. Since when in The Original Evil Dead trilogy you saw people burning the cabin down and burning bodys? Or burning people alive, since when? Shouldn't be in the book of the dead a passage that could call it off the evil mean spirits and suck them in a portal of hell? That was in Evil Dead 2 and they did not use that concept in this movie! The rape scane in which Mia (Jane Levy) was raped by treas was laughable and when she was possessed by evil spirits was a mess and she was a joke. It wasn't executed well, it wasn't original, it wasn't believable. All the characters are terrible and not likeable. They went and killed off likeable characters. The filming locations are terrible, they were filming in New Zealand. The filming locations of this movie was god awful. The music was terrible, the acting was irritating, The movie was nothing new or fresh.
If actress Elizabeth Blackmore as Natalie would at least survive or been a main heroine I would like it. The actress Elizabeth Blackmore was at least likeable good, but no they killed her off! Director Fede Alvarez probably did not like the actress, so he killed her character off, well thanks a lot Alvarez! Actor Shiloh Fernandez as David was good likeable. I would give it pass if in this movie David would be the main hero and survivor at least but NO! Alvarez killed him too, he did not care!!!! The actresss Jane Levy as Mia was ugly gross and god damn ugly she was not beliveble enough as the main heroine! How did she know how to use chainsaw against an evil possessed demon? It wasn't writen in the book! The movie has a foul bad language. Every character in every sentence is swearing. The only swearing I heard from Ash was in Army of Darkness and that was it. I do not tolorate bad launguage in this movie!
Why did they had to burn the cabin? Why did this movie killed animals? Since when in the original "Evil Dead" trilogy were killing animals? Mia kills dog and the movie kills cats. I guess this movie has no respeact to living beings animals. Mia played by Jane Levy was a drug addicted who get possessed by evil spirt and just like that her brother David bury's her. Kills her and get's her alive like that on a miracale fantasy way. The effects for the "Evil Dead" mean spirits were awful not beliveble. Mia riped her hand off after she got stuck by a car but she wasn't hurting, she wasn't in pain like seriously? Mia should passed out or been in shocked without an arm it is impossible to rip your hand off like that.
This movie breaks a lot of rules from the first original "The Evil Dead" movie. A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge breaks the rules from the first movie, but that movie get's crap, get's complain by fanboys it is gay, it breaks all the rule but this movie dosen't break the rules? Get 's better raiting by fan boys and get's the praise but A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge doesen't ? Some fans prefer this movie over the original movie. I am like what? Why? really? How is this movie better than the original film? It is based on original film and the story is not new, it is not decent it broke all the rules with terrible cast. So how is this movie better than the original old school horror movie? It is not even rated NC-17 it is hardly rated R, it is not gory, the blood is fake. Some people even prefer this movie over Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn I am like what? Does this people know how to rate a movie? How is this remake or reboot better than Evil Dead 2?
The filming locations in New Zealand in the woods were awful. The weather was lousy. Why the crew did not went filming the movie locations somewhere else: why they did not filmed the movie in forest Scotland? the forests there are beautiful places area. In Glasgow they are beautiful forest there too. Or in Tennessee US like was the original film shot, why did they not use those filming locations. They could filmed this film in North Carolina, USA like they filmed the sequel, better atmosphere there than is in here. The main heroine did not used shotgun or chainsaw that well. Jane Levy was ugly in this movie. Eric played Lou Taylor Pucci was a dumbass because, he released the evil spirits and he was responsible for the murder of his friends. Eric, Mia and Olivia played by Jessica Lucas were not likable cast.
This movie was way too overdramatic for my taste and not that good. The Evil Dead (1981), Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn are MILES way better old school classic horror films, this film failes to be a good horror film. A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge get's crap and has lower raking and it is still better horror movie than this reboot is! Yes I like Freddy's Revenge more. The Hills Have Eyes (2006) is a bloody slasher reboot that is MILES way better than this reboot and the original "The Hills Have Eyes" movie. That movie is a real horror movie this is NOT! The Blair Witch Project (1999) is a better horror movie in the woods, that movie is better yes I like it better than this "Evil Dead" remake. Friday the 13th (2009) reboot is better than this reboot.
This is poorly paced excuse film, they bringed Bruce Cambell on the end of the credits and his face is stone cold and he doesn't make nothing for me. This movie is a failure that's all I have to say. This is my review of a poorly paced lame excused of a movie that was only cash grab. P.