I am NOT vindicated

Rating: 2/10 (20 November 2013)

OK I see that ppl are confusing lots of things here. 1. The original was not meant to be a comedy it was strait horror...some things just ended up being goofy in the final cut.and over time 2. The original is uneasy to watch to some that do not watch horror films. The movie is a little un-nerving. 3. Evil Dead 2 IS NOT A REMAKE of Evil Dead one. An above poster clearly states the reasons why. Get over it you are wrong. 4. This movie ED13 as an above poster calls it. Was terrible. it had the gore (well more like buckets of blood.not much chunky stuff) of the first one and the needle in the eye scene was pretty good. But the rest of the movie just falls flat. Why? IT HAS NO TENSION. NO SUSPENSE. That is what made the first one work...that is what made all horror films from that era that are "good" work. The original? It's not scary. It has tension in a way that the remake could not grasp. Once they started dyeing....it was pretty simplistic after that...no build up at all. NONE. 5. the acting was indeed terrible. 6. One Major problem this movie has that not many (that I have seen post) are aware of, is that if the locals in the begging of the movie are aware of the book, which they are, and what the book can do...why don't they protect the book...destroy the book....or I don't know hide it at their place, so no one would tamper with it. NOOOO instead they wrap it in barbwire and try to scratch out some of the pages...sorry that doesn't work for me. 7. the score was forgettable.....like i already have 8. other than MIA I remember none of the cast. 9. I am glad this was NOT A SHOT BY SHOT REMAKE. But I am NOT glad at the product that was delivered. 10. Bruce's cameo at the end credits was sweet...in fact, the only thing I truly remember liking. 11. They tried to hard with Mia's hand....Its a jeep. In the blood soaked mud that has give. It was a FIBERGLASS hard top. IT WOULD NOT HAVE RIPPED OFF HER HAND. Broken it? Yes I'll go that far...but not ripped off. 12. They pulled a NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 2 on us. Ignored and changed the rules....and just made new spit up. 13. I was hesitant about the drug withdrawals at first...in fact I didn't like it. After I thought about the possibilities it would give us...I was optimistic. The only thing that it achieved was a good answer for them to NOT LEAVE THE CABIN, which works a little better than the motivation in the original. The final execution of the Drug addiction in the end falls flat for me. I was hoping that it would work and add a nice layer of TENSION to this movie...which is sorely needed. Yeah the movie made a return....doesn't mean it was good. Look at AVATAR....Barph I wanted to be proved wrong with this movie. I wanted to be proved wrong in the way that Real Steel proved me wrong. I wanted to hate the Remake of TCMbut it works. I enjoy the remake of Dawn of the DEAD. Hell I believe that if they changed it from a mall to something else and changed the title it, it could have been its own movie. They were just riding off of the name. This movie.I was right, and I do not feel vindicated for it. I was right about the remake of Nightmare On Elm StreetI was happy I was rightI was vindicated.this just hurts
I'm the ROCKABILLY MONGOOSE!