Where is the rest of this film?

Rating: Null/10 (28 March 2001)

I saw Enemy at the Gates last night, and though I had to go to the bathroom the whole time, I stuck it out until the end. I do not believe that my bladder had any affect on my oppinion.
I have no knowledge of the history of this story, so I will remain silent on those details. People complaining about the historical accuracy of this film have obviously never seen a movie, ever.
My impression of this film was that it was cut in half somewhere between the writing of the screenplay and the editing of the completed film. There are so many underdeveloped plots in this film, it's incredible. I believe that Jean-Jacques Annaud had a definate message in his film that is no longer there. It seems to me that he was making a statement about Communism and propaganda, but decided to make a genre picture halfway through.
The credits in this film, particularly the end credits are reminiscent of Communist propaganda. The slanted latters and the Pseudo-Russian Font are what I am talking about. Then we have Joseph Fiennes character. His first appearance is with the propaganda newspaper. This theme is mostly ignored the rest of the film, until Fiennes last words where Annaud's opinion on the failure of Communism is clearly voiced. This is much more interesting than the sniper duels, though maybe not quite as action-packed.
What happened to the accents in this film? For a film that takes place in Russia, the soundtrack has few russian accents.
Two good things. Ed Harris is always good. Something about his face communicates such intense pain and complexity. His is the only believable accent.
Also, the reason I know that Annaud is a better director than this film suggests is his direction of the love seen between Jude Law and Rachel Weisz. What a strange and entirely convincing sex act.