Stereotypical, bigoted pseudo-comedy

Rating: 2/10 (22 November 2010)

What can one expect of a film, which is supposed to be a comedy, that resorts to situations like:
1)A promiscuous school counselor, 2) A chlamydia-infected Christian teenager, 3) A closeted gay, 4) "Modern" parents: the mother was a self-confessed slut, the father an ex-gay (sic). 5) An overly fanatical Christian girl, 6) A not-so-trusty pastor, 7)A "disgusting" fat boy, 8) etc.
Well, first of all, this type of movie shows that those Hollywood geniuses are big cowards. They only have the guts to attack certain groups of people, e.g. Christians. Funny thing is that they do not have the guts to ridicule other religions. I wonder what would happen if they portrayed Muslims or black evangelicals like they portray white Christians in films.
OK, I know movies do not represent real situations and it is OK to exaggerate. But do everything needs to be about sex? All the time? Can't they think about anything that does not involve sex? Can't they come up with a funny situation that does not involve some sort of toilette humor or sex?
Is it OK to be a "deviant"? That what these movies show all the time.Not even Mark Twain is left alone. They always put forward this idea that for one to be happy one needs to have some sort of "peculiar" sexual behavior, like the pseudo-liberal post-modern parents of the main character.
Without Emma Stone (the only positive in this film) Easy A would have flunked catastrophically , because of her it deserved a D-...