First Nolan Movie

Rating: 10/10 (23 August 2017)

I spent an hour reading reviews and I am honestly amazed by how stupid some people are.
''The characters had no background or development, I didn't care for them.'' They weren't suppose to have any of that. Those few ''main'' characters are there to represent thousands of men who were in Dunkirk. It's not about a single person, a single soldier. They were basically a metaphor for everyone who fought there, or even in entire WW2. And not caring about the characters? God, I cared. I cared so much for each and every soldier I saw and I was hoping they'd get home eventually. I was on the edge of my seat, on the verge of crying.
''The scenes cut off and sometimes I didn't know whose perspective I was watching.'' Does it really freaking matters? I loved the fact scenes cut off and that at the times I was confused and needed a moment to catch up.
''I couldn't follow the story because scenes cut off and the story was non linear.'' Can't help you there, you're just stupid.
''The sounds were so loud and the music annoying.'' THAT WAS THE BEST PART. IT SET THE MOOD FOR EVERYTHING. THE TICKING, THE SUSPENSE... IT WAS BRILLIANT.
''I didn't see Germans, we needed more battle scenes.'' Once again, that wasn't the point. The Germans didn't matter. It was those soldiers that mattered. Their lives. The movie wasn't about the war, or fighting. It was about men fighting for their lives and fighting to get home. The movie didn't need Germans or more fighting. We got British perspective because that's what Nolan wanted and he did a goddamn great job.
To conclude, this is the second war movie I've ever cared about. Next to Schindler's list. This is my first Nolan movie. And now I'm gonna go watch all his other movies and be glad I'm living at the same time as this damn genius. If I could rate this movie higher than 10, I WOULD.