Maybe good at Sundance, but it don't hold it's own in Hollywood

Rating: 5/10 (30 August 2002)

I see so many perfect ratings and rave reviews. These people are either very bias or total liars. I can see why this might shine at an independent film festival, but it does not hold its own when pitted against the world. "Odd" does not mean "good".
Camera work was decent.
Acting sucked, especially Donnie. Mary McDonell is the only one that carried her weight at all.
Script and story sucked. The writing tries too hard to make too many trite philosophical statement in the film. The moments when Donnie was supposed to be the misunderstood genius, I thought he sounded like a doped-up highschooler.