Tarantino's misconception: Would the audience buy anything?

Rating: 5/10 (26 October 2015)

It has always been the characters, development of the characters during the film and the manipulation of the audience by emphasizing some details within the conversation, which fascinated me in Tarantino movies. From that point of view we see another successful movie with its Dr. King Schultz, Calvin Candie, Django Freeman and the first two eye catcher shooting scenes which show us the real Dr. King Schultz. However there are some negative comments to make without being 'nit-picking': It is not his 'crusade to ennoble violence' or some zooming, which has become his signature dish that I would like to criticize. It is rather the attempt to draw out the length of the movie -or script- with the help of multiple peek points to show more of the violence, more of clichÃ© Hollywood conversations and drama and commercial music so that the audience achieves multiple orgasms. Unlike 'There were will blood' (2007), which is another 160 minutes-film, 'Django' didn't have anything more to say after 130th minute. With 'Django' Tarantino has proved that he lost the cinematic sensitiveness and reached the point, where he is allowed to think that the audience would buy anything what he would show in the movie.