Anti-racism or pro-racism?

Rating: 6/10 (7 June 2013)

I went into this movie knowing that it would be about slavery and how badly blacks was treated in southern US before the civil war. I expected it to be pretty darn racist and no question that it was. History is history after all and we should remember the bad things humanity did instead of sweeping it under the carpet.
The main characters are played by very good actors, which both do a splendid job in their roles and along of supporting cast is also very convincing and the acting overall is good.
However, my main problem with this movie was that the more i watched it, the more it turned from an "anti-slaver" movie to an "anti-white" movie. If this movie was meant to be against racism it failed miserably. Despite Django being saved by a white man from hes slavers, helping him get back on the people that hurt him and find hes wive so they can reunite.
Django says on numerous occasions that he enjoys "killing white people" and not the slavers specifically or the ones who look down on him. He seem to be absolutely filled with hatred against the white race.
Although this is understandable considering what he has gone through and how he and hes wive has been treated, it sends the wrong message to the audience. This movie promotes racism and does not do what i think it intended to do - be an opponent to racism.
Beyond that, the production values are for the most part great and acting as i've said above is very good. With a better writer this movie could have been a classic, but as it stands its a mediocre film.
Thanks for reading, Johan