Hell a lot of bullets, so few acting...

Rating: 5/10 (1 November 2016)

Tarantino lost his way somewhere in '00s (personal opinion) last great film of I believe was "Pulp Fiction". After 1995, when all big films became visual he lost his personal stamp in his creations. Django is great but damn exploited topic, and I would say poorly told here.
There were 3 hr of story and I bet around 1.5 hrs of bullet, blood, gore –ish stuff I bet if someone can count the bullet fired in this film and divide this per number of armed man there, they would have more ammo they can actually carry maybe American audience love this but I would expected more drama more passion, better development of Mr. Django's wife she was almost invisible. Django though was so "cool" he don't move, don't take even breath he is so "antipode of acting". Leo was real "ass" exactly what he needed to be. Rich, unmannerly man who doesn't respect other peoples' life I gave 1 extra star only because of him. I'm sure a lot of people would love this movie, but that's it moving pictures of bullets, drops of blood flying around and so few time to make the story. That's this film's problem. If you want to test it – prepare the remote, you can easily gain 30-50 mins of your live back simply skipping few parts of this.