Tarantino hates the way history turned out

Rating: 2/10 (14 February 2015)

This is as typical Tarantinoesque ultra-violent "race"-message as one could expect from start to finish in its unnecessary length of 165 minutes, and I for one am really getting fed up by it. Its obvious occasional funny bits can't compensate the dullness of those innumerable "transit"scenes and everything that happens with Leonardo DiCaprio and afterwards.
On the other hand, at least DiCaprio approaches the seeds of truth when he explains the black man's "willingnes to submit" to their "white masters", instead of fighting back from day one or die trying; there would had not been such thing as 'black slavery'. And this Django-character here actually proves that point: since they simply didn't refuse to be slaves, the black man's only hope was that there would emerge some kind of miraculous black superhero who could overcome and kill all the white people. Of course there never did. It was only the white man who had the power to took and eventually give back (well, kind of) their freedom. And only because it was the white man who came up first with e.g. powerful industrialism and agriculture the things weren't other way around completely ("for some reason" the Africans were never much of a threat for Europeans but Mongols and Ottomans among others definitely were).
By the way, how did Django the Slave learn how to read, shoot a gun and use a whip like a pro only Tarantino the Writer knows.
All above said, Waltz is very good once again as expected and even Foxx of which I never liked too much in other movies ("Ray" of course being an exception) performs OK in his "impossible" role. But as some have already mentioned, it's the final 1/3 or so that destroys this movie almost utterly in all its stupidity.