People need to quit with the gag reviews and ratings.

Rating: 3/10 (14 August 2009)

I looked at ratings and was tricked into seeing this. Normally with a bad review I would start by stating what was wrong with the movie, but this time, I'll do the quick part first.
The ONLY redeeming features were decent special fx and cool looking explosions. But by the time you see any of that you're already bored by the lack of a plot and mockumentury "style" filming and nauseas from the crazy cameraman. Now the bad. EVERYTHING ELSE. I couldn't really get into the movie for a half an hour because they don't explain anything. Even with all of the puking you see in the beginning it never gets any easier to watch because the aliens are bugs. Of the 3 major characters, only one had any significant amount of lines which led to a poor story that was handicapped at best by the subject matter. Aliens stranded in Africa getting evicted to a different reservation? Seriously, who thought that up? Next come the plot holes... We don't want the aliens here, which is why we're evicting them from the town. So why does the Alien have to escape to get help to rescue the rest? Also, why couldn't he take the main character with him and help him during the 3 year trip instead of making him wait on a hostile planet? Did I mention the Cameraman? He seemed to be an epileptic on meth with the shaking and quick zooming in and out. It was what i would expect from an 8 year old ADHD child on a roller coaster. My advice is to skip it. If you want to see a horribly filmed movie without a plot yet had cool explosions, check out Cloverfield.